Literature DB >> 15591398

Influence of herd environment on health and fertility and their relationship with milk production.

J J Windig1, M P L Calus, R F Veerkamp.   

Abstract

High levels of milk production in dairy cattle can have negative side effects on health and fertility traits. This paper explores the relationships among milk yield, health, and fertility traits both across and within herd environments on a national scale. A total of 456,574 lactations from 3904 herds recorded from 1995 to 1999 in The Netherlands were analyzed. Herd environment was defined by 41 variables derived from production records and the annual national agricultural survey. Principal components analysis reduced this set to 4 components: intensity, defined as average production per cow, average fertility, farm size, and relative performance indicating whether herds had good (poor) health and fertility despite a high (low) production. Both fertility and health were better for some traits in high-intensity herds and for other traits in low-intensity herds. In high-intensity herds, somatic cell count (SCC) levels were lower, drops in production occurred more often, and first service took place earlier but with lower success. High fertility occurred more often in herds located on sandy soils and in those that had lower SCC levels, had fewer drops in production and higher cow survival. On large farms, drops in production were less frequent and fertility was somewhat better. The within-herd analysis showed that the relationship of milk yield with health and fertility was stronger in herds with high production, fertility, or both. In herds with poor relative performance, there was no difference in production levels between animals with good health or fertility and those with poor health or fertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15591398     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72693-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

Review 1.  Mastitis effects on reproductive performance in dairy cattle: a review.

Authors:  Narender Kumar; A Manimaran; A Kumaresan; S Jeyakumar; L Sreela; P Mooventhan; M Sivaram
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  The association of ruminal pH and some metabolic parameters with conception rate at first artificial insemination in Thai dairy cows.

Authors:  Chaidate Inchaisri; Somchai Chanpongsang; Jos Noordhuizen; Henk Hogeveen
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Little genetic variability in resilience among cattle exists for a range of performance traits across herds in Ireland differing in Fasciola hepatica prevalence.

Authors:  Alan J Twomey; David A Graham; Michael L Doherty; Astrid Blom; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Estimation of genetic variance for macro- and micro-environmental sensitivity using double hierarchical generalized linear models.

Authors:  Han A Mulder; Lars Rönnegård; W Freddy Fikse; Roel F Veerkamp; Erling Strandberg
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Accuracies of univariate and multivariate genomic prediction models in African cassava.

Authors:  Uche Godfrey Okeke; Deniz Akdemir; Ismail Rabbi; Peter Kulakow; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  A systematic approach to analyse the impact of farm-profiles on bovine health.

Authors:  Caspar Matzhold; Jana Lasser; Christa Egger-Danner; Birgit Fuerst-Waltl; Thomas Wittek; Johann Kofler; Franz Steininger; Peter Klimek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of different five-day progesterone-based synchronization protocols on the estrous response and follicular/luteal dynamics in dairy cows.

Authors:  Fernando López-Gatius; Irene López-Helguera; Fabio De Rensis; Irina Garcia-Ispierto
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.214

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.