Literature DB >> 15591392

Evaluation of quality, quantity, and timing of colostrum feeding on immunoglobulin G1 absorption in Jersey calves.

E H Jaster1.   

Abstract

Twenty-four Jersey calves were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups (6 calves per group). Pooled colostrum from first milkings (colostrum high in IgG1, 84 mg/mL) of multiparous cows was fed to treatment groups 1 and 2. Pooled colostrums from second and third milkings (colostrum low in IgG1, 31.2 mg/mL) of multiparous Jersey cows were fed to calves in treatment groups 3 and 4. The quality and timing of colostrum feeding was as follows: group 1 were fed (high IgG1 colostrum) 4 L at 0 h (birth); group 2 calves were fed (high IgG1 colostrum) 2 L at 0 h (birth) and 2 L at 12 h; group 3 calves were fed (low IgG1 colostrum) 4 L at 0 h (birth); and group 4 calves were fed (low IgG1 colostrum) 2 L at 0 h (birth) and 2 L at 12 h. Mean serum Ig() was 38.66, 45.66, 13.81 and 9.95 mg/mL in groups 1 to 4, respectively. At 48 h of age, calves fed colostrum with higher concentrations of total ingested IgG1 (groups 1 and 2) had significantly higher serum protein and IgG1 concentrations than calves fed low IgG1 colostrum at 48 h of age (groups 3 and 4). Mean apparent efficiency of IgG1 absorption was measured at 48 h; calves (group 2) receiving 2 L at birth and 2 L at 12 h of high IgG1 colostrum had higher mean apparent efficiency of IgG1 absorption than calves (group 4) fed 2 L of colostrum that was low in IgG1 at birth and 12 h (31.2 and 18.2% in groups 2 and 4, respectively). Results suggest that Jersey calves should receive 2 separate feedings of high quality colostrum to maximize the colostral IgG1 absorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15591392     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72687-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Clinical outcome of calves with failure of passive transfer as diagnosed by a commercially available IgG quick test kit.

Authors:  George Stilwell; Rita C Carvalho
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Influence of Parity on the Colostrum Bacterial Community Composition in Holstein Cows.

Authors:  J S Silva; D R G Lopes; S M Moreira; T G R Veloso; C B P Bento; P P Rotta; H C Mantovani
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-19

3.  Temporal kinetics of bovine mammary IgG secretion into colostrum and transition milk.

Authors:  Kasey M Schalich; Olivia M Reiff; Blake T Nguyen; Cassandra L Lamb; Cecilia R Mondoza; Vimal Selvaraj
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Evaluation of factors associated with immunoglobulin G, fat, protein, and lactose concentrations in bovine colostrum and colostrum management practices in grassland-based dairy systems in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  A Dunn; A Ashfield; B Earley; M Welsh; A Gordon; S J Morrison
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Composition and Factors Affecting Quality of Bovine Colostrum: A Review.

Authors:  Kamila Puppel; Marcin Gołębiewski; Grzegorz Grodkowski; Jan Slósarz; Małgorzata Kunowska-Slósarz; Paweł Solarczyk; Monika Łukasiewicz; Marek Balcerak; Tomasz Przysucha
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  A Scoping Review of On-Farm Colostrum Management Practices for Optimal Transfer of Immunity in Dairy Calves.

Authors:  Lisa Robbers; Ruurd Jorritsma; Mirjam Nielen; Ad Koets
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-19

Review 7.  Determining Immunoglobulin Content of Bovine Colostrum and Factors Affecting the Outcome: A Review.

Authors:  Johanna Ahmann; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner; Wolfgang Büscher
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.