Literature DB >> 15590846

Detrimental effects of overstuffing or understuffing with a radial head replacement in the medial collateral-ligament deficient elbow.

F Van Glabbeek1, R P Van Riet, J A Baumfeld, P G Neale, S W O'Driscoll, B F Morrey, K-N An.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comminuted radial head fractures associated with an injury of the medial collateral ligament can be treated with a radial head implant. We hypothesized that lengthening and shortening of the radial neck would alter the kinematics and the pressure through the radiocapitellar joint in the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow.
METHODS: The effects of lengthening (2.5 and 5 mm) and shortening (2.5 and 5 mm) of the radial neck were assessed in six human cadaveric upper extremities in which the medial collateral ligament had been surgically released. The three-dimensional spatial orientation of the ulna was recorded during simulated active motion from extension to flexion. Total varus-valgus laxity and ulnar rotation were measured. Radiocapitellar joint pressure was assessed with use of pressure-sensitive film.
RESULTS: Radial neck lengthening or shortening of >/=2.5 mm significantly changed the kinematics in the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow. Lengthening caused a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in varus-valgus laxity and ulnar rotation (p < 0.05), with the ulna tracking in varus and external rotation. Shortening caused a significant increase in varus-valgus laxity (p < 0.05) and ulnar rotation (p < 0.05), with the ulna tracking in valgus and internal rotation. The pressure on the radiocapitellar joint was significantly increased after 2.5 mm of lengthening.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that accurate restoration of radial length is important and that axial understuffing or overstuffing of the radiohumeral joint by >/=2.5 mm alters both elbow kinematics and radiocapitellar pressure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This in vitro cadaver study indicates that a radial head replacement should be performed with the same level of concern for accuracy and reproducibility of component position and orientation as is appropriate with any other prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15590846     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200412000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  39 in total

1.  Comparison between radial head replacement and open reduction and internal fixation in clinical treatment of unstable, multi-fragmented radial head fractures.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Si-cheng Wang; Lie-hu Cao; Guo-qing Yang; Ming Li; Jia-can Su
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The acute bipolar radial head replacement for isolated unreconstructable fractures of the radial head.

Authors:  Andrea Celli; Francesco Modena; Luigi Celli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2010-05

3.  Is a silastic radial head still a reasonable option?

Authors:  Yariv Maghen; Andrew J Leo; Jennifer W Hsu; Michael R Hausman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison between radial head arthroplasty and open reduction and internal fixation in patients with radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV): a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Jun Duan; Fengsheng Li
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-01-21

5.  [Endoprosthetics of acute radial head fractures].

Authors:  K J Burkhart; K Wegmann; C Ries; L P Müller
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Can ulnar variance be used to detect overstuffing after radial head arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jun-Gyu Moon; Jin-Ho Hong; Nitin Bither; Won-Yong Shon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Simple overlay device for determining radial head and neck height.

Authors:  Jun-Gyu Moon; Richard D Southgate; James S Fitzsimmons; Shawn W O'Driscoll
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  [Radial head fractures : Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and outcome].

Authors:  A Harbrecht; N Ott; M Hackl; T Leschinger; K Wegmann; L P Müller
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Disadvantages of having a shortening of the proximal radius.

Authors:  Nick F J Hilgersom; Denise Eygendaal; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Radial shortening osteotomy reduces radiocapitellar contact pressures while preserving valgus stability of the elbow.

Authors:  Michael Hackl; Kilian Wegmann; Stephanie L Kahmann; Nicolai Heinze; Manfred Staat; Wolfram F Neiss; Martin Scaal; Lars P Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.