| Literature DB >> 15589375 |
Yun-Sook Kim1, Hean Zhuang, Raymond C Koehler, Sylvain Doré.
Abstract
Heme oxygenases (HO-1 and HO-2) catalyze the NADPH-cytochrome P(450) reductase (CPR)-dependent degradation of heme into iron, carbon monoxide, and biliverdin, which is reduced into bilirubin. Under basal conditions, HO-1 is often undetected and can be induced by numerous stress conditions. Although HO-2 is constitutively expressed, its activity appears to be regulated by post-translational modifications. HO activity has been associated with cellular protection, by which it degrades heme, a prooxidant, into bioactive metabolites. Under given circumstances, overexpression of HO-1 can render cells more sensitive to free radicals. Here, we investigated the properties of human HO isoforms that protect against oxidative stress. Considering that CPR can be a limiting factor for optimal HO activity, we tested stable HO-1 and HO-2 cell lines that derived from the CPR cells. Results indicate that the HO-1 and HO-2 cells are more resistant than controls to hemin and to the organic tert-butyl hydroperoxide, t-BuOOH. However, HO-1 cells are less resistant than HO-2 cells to hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)). The levels of oxidatively modified proteins of HO-1 and HO-2 cells in response to t-BuOOH toxicity are identical, but the level of oxidatively modified proteins of HO-2 cells is less than that of HO-1 cells in response to H(2)O(2) toxicity. Performing subcellular fractionations revealed that HO-2 and CPR are found together in the microsomal fractions, whereas HO-1 is partially present in the microsome and also found in other fractions, such as the cytosol. These same findings were observed in non-transfected primary neurons where HO-1 proteins were chemically induced with 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15dPGJ(2)). The differences in subcellular localization of HO-1 and HO-2 could explain some of the discrepancies in their cellular activity and enzymatic protective mechanisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15589375 DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.09.031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Free Radic Biol Med ISSN: 0891-5849 Impact factor: 7.376