Literature DB >> 15588568

The advantage of factorial mating under selection is uncovered by deterministically predicted rates of inbreeding.

Anders Christian Sørensen1, Peer Berg, John A Woolliams.   

Abstract

Rates of inbreeding (DeltaF) in selected populations were predicted using the framework of long-term genetic contributions and validated against stochastic simulations. Deterministic predictions decomposed DeltaF into four components due to: finite population size, directional selection, covariance of genetic contribution of mates, and deviation of variance of family size from that expected from a Poisson distribution. Factorial (FM) and hierarchical (HM) mating systems were compared under mass and sib-index selection. Prediction errors were in most cases for DeltaF less than 10% and for rate of gain less than 5%. DelatF was higher with index than mass selection. DeltaF was lower with FM than HM in all cases except random selection. FM reduced the variance of the average breeding value of the mates of an individual. This reduced the impact of the covariance of contributions of mates on DeltaF. Thus, contributions of mates were less correlated with FM than HM, causing smaller deviations of converged contributions from the optimum contributions. With index selection, FM also caused a smaller variance of number of offspring selected from each parent. This reduced variance of family size reduced DeltaF further. FM increases the flexibility in breeding schemes for achieving the optimum genetic contributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15588568      PMCID: PMC2697247          DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-37-1-57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


(To access the full article, please see PDF)
  7 in total

1.  Effect of non-random mating on genomic and BLUP selection schemes.

Authors:  Kahsay G Nirea; Anna K Sonesson; John A Woolliams; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens.

Authors:  Anna Wolc; Honghua H Zhao; Jesus Arango; Petek Settar; Janet E Fulton; Neil P O'Sullivan; Rudolf Preisinger; Chris Stricker; David Habier; Rohan L Fernando; Dorian J Garrick; Susan J Lamont; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.

Authors:  H Liu; M Henryon; A C Sørensen
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genetic parameters and selection response for the harvest body weight of the giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) in a breeding program in China.

Authors:  Juan Sui; Sheng Luan; Guoliang Yang; Zhenglong Xia; Kun Luo; Qiongying Tang; Xia Lu; Xianhong Meng; Jie Kong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Optimization of selection contribution and mate allocations in monoecious tree breeding populations.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Selective advantage of implementing optimal contributions selection and timescales for the convergence of long-term genetic contributions.

Authors:  David M Howard; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Pieter W Knap; Valentin D Kremer; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Favorable Conditions for Genomic Evaluation to Outperform Classical Pedigree Evaluation Highlighted by a Proof-of-Concept Study in Poplar.

Authors:  Marie Pégard; Vincent Segura; Facundo Muñoz; Catherine Bastien; Véronique Jorge; Leopoldo Sanchez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.