Literature DB >> 15587947

How to change implicit drug use-related cognitions in prevention: a transdisciplinary integration of findings from experimental psychopathology, social cognition, memory, and experimental learning psychology.

Reinout W Wiers1, Peter J de Jong, Remco Havermans, Marko Jelicic.   

Abstract

A recent study from our lab found that an intervention aimed at changing alcohol-related cognitions in heavy drinkers resulted in significant changes in explicit cognitions, in the absence of changes in implicit cognitions. This raised the question how implicit alcohol- and drug-related cognitions could successfully be changed. Here, the literature on changing implicit cognitions from four areas of research is reviewed: 1) memory research (resistance to change of implicit vs. explicit memories); 2) learning psychology (attempts to change learned associations); 3) experimental psychopathology (attempts to change an attentional bias); and 4) social cognition research (attempts to change implicit attitudes). Further, studies directly aimed at changing implicit drug-related cognitions are reviewed. From the integrative review, it is argued that it is important to consider the level of representation (i.e., specific vs. global) when comparing studies aimed at changing implicit cognitions: there is converging evidence that specific implicit cognitions and memories are resistant to change, whereas global implicit cognitions and memories appear to be more malleable. The results are integrated into an overall picture of what it takes to change implicit cognitions in general and what can be expected with respect to the effects of such a change on behavior, and how this could be used in alcohol-use and drug use-related preventive interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15587947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Subst Use Misuse        ISSN: 1082-6084            Impact factor:   2.164


  10 in total

1.  Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol.

Authors:  Matt Field; Brian Eastwood
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Comparison of indirect assessments of association as predictors of marijuana use among at-risk adolescents.

Authors:  Susan L Ames; Jerry L Grenard; Carolien Thush; Steve Sussman; Reinout W Wiers; Alan W Stacy
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Explicit beliefs about aggression, implicit knowledge structures, and teen dating violence.

Authors:  Ernest N Jouriles; David Rosenfield; Renee McDonald; Anne L Kleinsasser; M Catherine Dodson
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-07

4.  Administering the Implicit Association Test in an ecological momentary assessment study.

Authors:  Andrew J Waters; Elizabeth K Miller; Yisheng Li
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2010-02

Review 5.  Understanding and shifting drug-related decisions: contributions of automatic decision-making processes.

Authors:  Kenneth M Carpenter; Gillinder Bedi; Nehal P Vadhan
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  The Intergenerational Transmission of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Smoking.

Authors:  Steven J Sherman; Laurie Chassin; Clark Presson; Dong-Chul Seo; Jonathan T Macy
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-02-01

7.  Lines in the sand: Social representations of substance use boundaries in life narratives.

Authors:  Karen F Trocki; Laurence O Michalak; Laurie Drabble
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2013-04

8.  Depressive symptoms, ruminative thinking, marijuana use motives, and marijuana outcomes: A multiple mediation model among college students in five countries.

Authors:  Adrian J Bravo; Melissa Sotelo; Angelina Pilatti; Laura Mezquita; Jennifer P Read
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Implicit Attitudes and Smoking Behavior in a Smoking Cessation Induction Trial.

Authors:  Hyoung S Lee; Merideth Addicott; Laura E Martin; Kari J Harris; Kathy Goggin; Kimber P Richter; Christi A Patten; F Joseph McClernon; Kandace Fleming; Delwyn Catley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise?

Authors:  Matt Field; Theodora Duka; Brian Eastwood; Robert Child; Mary Santarcangelo; Melanie Gayton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 4.415

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.