Literature DB >> 15586295

Ecological and social effects on reproduction and local recruitment in the red-backed shrike.

Mathis Müller1, Gilberto Pasinelli, Karin Schiegg, Reto Spaar, Lukas Jenni.   

Abstract

Numerous hypotheses have been proposed to explain variation in reproductive performance and local recruitment of animals. While most studies have examined the influence of one or a few social and ecological factors on fitness traits, comprehensive analyses jointly testing the relative importance of each of many factors are rare. We investigated how a multitude of environmental and social conditions simultaneously affected reproductive performance and local recruitment of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio (L.). Specifically, we tested hypotheses relating to timing of breeding, parental quality, nest predation, nest site selection, territory quality, intraspecific density and weather. Using model selection procedures, predictions of each hypothesis were first analysed separately, before a full model was constructed including variables selected in the single-hypothesis tests. From 1988 to 1992, 50% of 332 first clutches produced at least one fledgling, while 38.7% of 111 replacement clutches were successful. Timing of breeding, nest site selection, predation pressure, territory quality and intraspecific density influenced nest success in the single-hypothesis tests. The full model revealed that nest success was negatively associated with laying date, intraspecific density, and year, while nest success increased with nest concealment. Number of fledglings per successful nest was only influenced by nest concealment: better-camouflaged nests produced more fledglings. Probability of local recruitment was related to timing of breeding, parental quality and territory quality in the single-hypothesis tests. The full models confirmed the important role of territory quality for recruitment probability. Our results suggest that reproductive performance, and particularly nest success, of the red-backed shrike is primarily affected by timing of breeding, nest site selection, and intraspecific density. This study highlights the importance of considering many factors at the same time, when trying to evaluate their relative contributions to fitness and life history evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15586295     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1770-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Inbreeding and experience affect response to climate change by endangered woodpeckers.

Authors:  Karin Schiegg; Gilberto Pasinelli; Jeffrey R Walters; Susan J Daniels
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Model selection in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jerald B Johnson; Kristian S Omland
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Age and reproduction in birds - hypotheses and tests.

Authors:  P Forslund; T Pärt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Strong density-dependent survival and recruitment regulate the abundance of a coral reef fish.

Authors:  Graham E Forrester
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Dissecting common buzzard lifespan and lifetime reproductive success: the relative importance of food, competition, weather, habitat and individual attributes.

Authors:  Oliver Krüger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  Habitat-performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Gaillard; Mark Hebblewhite; Anne Loison; Mark Fuller; Roger Powell; Mathieu Basille; Bram Van Moorter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Demographic response to environmental variation in breeding, stopover and non-breeding areas in a migratory passerine.

Authors:  Michael Schaub; Hans Jakober; Wolfgang Stauber
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Microhabitat selection by three common bird species of montane farmlands in Northern Greece.

Authors:  Rigas Tsiakiris; Kalliopi Stara; John Pantis; Stefanos Sgardelis
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Small and large wetland fragments are equally suited breeding sites for a ground-nesting passerine.

Authors:  Gilberto Pasinelli; Christian Mayer; Alexandre Gouskov; Karin Schiegg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Impact of nesting mortality on avian breeding phenology: a case study on the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio).

Authors:  Jan Hušek; Karel Weidinger; Peter Adamík; Tore Slagsvold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reproductive Performance of a Declining Forest Passerine in Relation to Environmental and Social Factors: Implications for Species Conservation.

Authors:  Alex Grendelmeier; Raphaël Arlettaz; Michael Gerber; Gilberto Pasinelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nest Predation Deviates from Nest Predator Abundance in an Ecologically Trapped Bird.

Authors:  Franck A Hollander; Hans Van Dyck; Gilles San Martin; Nicolas Titeux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The influence of climatic variation and density on the survival of an insular passerine Zosterops lateralis.

Authors:  Erik M Sandvig; Tim Coulson; Jiro Kikkawa; Sonya M Clegg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Breeding phenology of birds: mechanisms underlying seasonal declines in the risk of nest predation.

Authors:  Kathi L Borgmann; Courtney J Conway; Michael L Morrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of rearing conditions on natal dispersal processes in a long-lived predator bird.

Authors:  Maialen Azpillaga; Joan Real; Antonio Hernández-Matías
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.