Literature DB >> 15585747

Access to postsecondary education through sign language interpreting.

Marc Marschark1, Patricia Sapere, Carol Convertino, Rosemarie Seewagen.   

Abstract

Despite the importance of sign language interpreting for many deaf students, there is surprisingly little research concerning its effectiveness in the classroom. The limited research in this area is reviewed, and a new study is presented that included 23 interpreters, 105 deaf students, and 22 hearing students. Students saw two interpreted university-level lectures, each preceded by a test of prior content knowledge and followed by a post-lecture assessment of learning. A variety of demographic and qualitative data also were collected. Variables of primary interest included the effects of a match or mismatch between student interpreting preferences (interpreting vs. transliteration) and the actual mode of interpreting, student-interpreter familiarity, and interpreter experience. Results clarify previous contradictory findings concerning the importance of student interpreting preferences and extend earlier studies indicating that deaf students acquire less than hearing peers from interpreted college-level lectures. Issues relating to access and success in integrated academic settings are discussed as they relate to relations among student characteristics, interpreter characteristics, and educational settings.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15585747     DOI: 10.1093/deafed/eni002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  8 in total

1.  Classroom Interpreting and Visual Information Processing in Mainstream Education for Deaf Students: Live or Memorex?

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Jeff B Pelz; Carol Convertino; Patricia Sapere; Mary Ellen Arndt; Rosemarie Seewagen
Journal:  Am Educ Res J       Date:  2005

2.  Benefits of sign language interpreting and text alternatives for deaf students' classroom learning.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Greg Leigh; Patricia Sapere; Denis Burnham; Carol Convertino; Michael Stinson; Harry Knoors; Mathijs P J Vervloed; William Noble
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2006-08-23

3.  Simultaneous communication supports learning in noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Helen Blom; Marc Marschark; Elizabeth Machmer
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-12-23

4.  Vocabulary Knowledge of Deaf and Hearing Postsecondary Students.

Authors:  Thomastine Sarchet; Marc Marschark; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino; Patricia Sapere; Richard Dirmyer
Journal:  J Postsecond Educ Disabil       Date:  2014

5.  Simultaneous Communication and Cochlear Implants in the Classroom?

Authors:  Helen C Blom; Marc Marschark
Journal:  Deafness Educ Int       Date:  2015-09

6.  Are Deaf Students Visual Learners?

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Carolyn Morrison; Jennifer Lukomski; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2013-06-01

7.  Unveiling teachers' beliefs on visual cognition and learning styles of deaf and hard of hearing students: A Portuguese-Swedish study.

Authors:  Filipa M Rodrigues; Joana R Rato; Ana Mineiro; Ingela Holmström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Welcoming Deaf Students into STEM: Recommendations for University Science Education.

Authors:  Derek C Braun; M Diane Clark; Amber E Marchut; Caroline M Solomon; Megan Majocha; Zachary Davenport; Raja S Kushalnagar; Jason Listman; Peter C Hauser; Cara Gormally
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.