Literature DB >> 15585118

Gene selection for sample classifications in microarray experiments.

Chen-An Tsai1, Chun-Houh Chen, Te-Chang Lee, I-Ching Ho, Ueng-Cheng Yang, James J Chen.   

Abstract

DNA microarray technology provides useful tools for profiling global gene expression patterns in different cell/tissue samples. One major challenge is the large number of genes relative to the number of samples. The use of all genes can suppress or reduce the performance of a classification rule due to the noise of nondiscriminatory genes. Selection of an optimal subset from the original gene set becomes an important prestep in sample classification. In this study, we propose a family-wise error (FWE) rate approach to selection of discriminatory genes for two-sample or multiple-sample classification. The FWE approach controls the probability of the number of one or more false positives at a prespecified level. A public colon cancer data set is used to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach for the two classification methods: k nearest neighbors (k-NN) and support vector machine (SVM). The selected gene sets from the proposed procedure appears to perform better than or comparable to several results reported in the literature using the univariate analysis without performing multivariate search. In addition, we apply the FWE approach to a toxicogenomic data set with nine treatments (a control and eight metals, As, Cd, Ni, Cr, Sb, Pb, Cu, and AsV) for a total of 55 samples for a multisample classification. Two gene sets are considered: the gene set omegaF formed by the ANOVA F-test, and a gene set omegaT formed by the union of one-versus-all t-tests. The predicted accuracies are evaluated using the internal and external crossvalidation. Using the SVM classification, the overall accuracies to predict 55 samples into one of the nine treatments are above 80% for internal crossvalidation. OmegaF has slightly higher accuracy rates than omegaT. The overall predicted accuracies are above 70% for the external crossvalidation; the two gene sets omegaT and omegaF performed equally well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15585118     DOI: 10.1089/dna.2004.23.607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Cell Biol        ISSN: 1044-5498            Impact factor:   3.311


  4 in total

1.  Gene selection with multiple ordering criteria.

Authors:  James J Chen; Chen-An Tsai; Shengli Tzeng; Chun-Houh Chen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 2.  Gene module level analysis: identification to networks and dynamics.

Authors:  Xuewei Wang; Ertugrul Dalkic; Ming Wu; Christina Chan
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 9.740

3.  Sex-specific genomic biomarkers for individualized treatment of life-threatening diseases.

Authors:  Hojin Moon; Karen L Lopez; Grace I Lin; James J Chen
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.434

4.  Comparison of linear discriminant analysis methods for the classification of cancer based on gene expression data.

Authors:  Desheng Huang; Yu Quan; Miao He; Baosen Zhou
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.