Literature DB >> 15584777

Categorization of above and below spatial relations by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Giovanna Spinozzi1, Giorgia Lubrano, Valentina Truppa.   

Abstract

Using a matching-to-sample procedure, the researchers investigated tufted capuchins' (Cebus apella) ability to form categorical representations of above and below spatial relations. In Experiment 1, 5 capuchins correctly matched bar-dot stimuli on the basis of the relative above and below location of their constituent elements. The monkeys showed a positive transfer of performance both when the bar-dot distance in the two comparison stimuli differed from that of the sample and when the actual location of the matching stimulus and the nonmatching stimulus on the apparatus was modified. In Experiment 2, the researchers systematically changed the shapes of the located object (the dot) or the reference object (the horizontal bar). These manipulations did not affect the monkeys' performance. Overall, the data suggest that capuchins can form abstract, conceptual-like representations for above and below spatial relations. Copyright 2004 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15584777     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.4.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  10 in total

1.  Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols?

Authors:  E Addessi; L Crescimbene; E Visalberghi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Conceptual thresholds for same and different in old-(Macaca mulatta) and new-world (Cebus apella) monkeys.

Authors:  Timothy M Flemming
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Prefrontal cortex activity during the discrimination of relative distance.

Authors:  Aldo Genovesio; Satoshi Tsujimoto; Steven P Wise
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Conceptualization of above and below relationships by an insect.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Adrian G Dyer; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Navigating two-dimensional mazes: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and capuchins (Cebus apella sp.) profit from experience differently.

Authors:  Dorothy M Fragaszy; Erica Kennedy; Aeneas Murnane; Charles Menzel; Gene Brewer; Julie Johnson-Pynn; William Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Reproductive parameters of a captive colony of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) from 1984 to 2006.

Authors:  Annarita Wirz; M Cristina Riviello
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Can old-world and new-world monkeys judge spatial above/below relations to be the same or different? Some of them, but not all of them.

Authors:  Roger K R Thompson; Timothy M Flemming; Carl Erick Hagmann
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Same/different concept learning by capuchin monkeys in matching-to-sample tasks.

Authors:  Valentina Truppa; Eva Piano Mortari; Duilio Garofoli; Sara Privitera; Elisabetta Visalberghi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transfer of the nonmatch-to-goal rule in monkeys across cognitive domains.

Authors:  Rossella Falcone; Sara Bevacqua; Erika Cerasti; Emiliano Brunamonti; Milena Cervelloni; Aldo Genovesio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High-Speed Videography Reveals How Honeybees Can Turn a Spatial Concept Learning Task Into a Simple Discrimination Task by Stereotyped Flight Movements and Sequential Inspection of Pattern Elements.

Authors:  Marie Guiraud; Mark Roper; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.