Literature DB >> 15584634

An evaluation of standardizing target ventilation for eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation using FEV1.

Barry A Spiering1, Daniel A Judelson, Kenneth W Rundell.   

Abstract

Athletes are required to provide objective documentation of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) to use beta2-agonists during Olympic competition. A positive response to bronchial provocation by eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation (EVH) is considered acceptable confirmation of EIB. Thirty times forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) is recommended as EVH target ventilation (TV), an intensity intended to estimate 85% of maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV). There is a paucity of data examining the accuracy of predicting MVV from FEV1 in elite athletes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 30 x FEV1 as standardized EVH TV. Maximal minute ventilation during exercise (VEmax) and pulmonary function of 78 elite winter athletes (25 males, 53 females; 25 EIB positive, 53 normal) were analyzed retrospectively. Adequacy and variability of the equation was ascertained by examining the ratio of EVH TV (30 x FEV1) to VEmax. VEmax was 99+/-11% of predicted MVV (35 x FEV1) and was positively related (r=0.85, p < or = 0.05). TV was 88+/-9% of VEmax (range: 64-109). For elite athletes, the high variability in 30 x FEV1 to standardize TV for EVH may result in under-diagnosis for low-end outliers. Since VEmax of elite endurance athletes is typically known (via maximal aerobic testing) we recommend 85% VEmax as a more accurate and reliable method to establish EVH TV for this group; if VEmax is not available, then 85% of measured MVV may be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15584634     DOI: 10.1081/jas-200028004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  7 in total

1.  High incidence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in triathletes of the Swiss national team.

Authors:  Bruno H Knöpfli; Mona Luke-Zeitoun; Serge P von Duvillard; Adrian Burki; Christian Bachlechner; Heidi Keller
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Diagnosis of asthma in adults.

Authors:  Alan G Kaplan; Meyer S Balter; Alan D Bell; Harold Kim; R Andrew McIvor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Diagnostic exercise challenge testing.

Authors:  Christopher Randolph
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Ventilation Rates Achieved in Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperpnea Challenge and Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction Diagnosis in Young Patients with Asthma.

Authors:  José Ângelo Rizzo; Laienne Carla Barbosa de Barros Albuquerque; Décio Medeiros; Claudio Gonsalves de Albuquerque; Edil de Albuquerque Rodrigues Filho; Marcos André de Moura Santos; Steve Hunter; Nadia Gaua; Marco Aurélio Valois de Correia Junior
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.584

5.  Effect of obesity on constant workrate exercise in hyperinflated men with COPD.

Authors:  Louis Laviolette; Francesco Sava; Denis E O'Donnell; Katherine A Webb; Alan L Hamilton; Steven Kesten; François Maltais
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 3.317

6.  Inconsistent calculation methodology for the eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea test affects the diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Authors:  Sarah Koch; Sean Michael Sinden; Michael Stephen Koehle
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2018-12-18

Review 7.  Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperpnea: Gold Standard for Diagnosing Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction in Athletes?

Authors:  James H Hull; Les Ansley; Oliver J Price; John W Dickinson; Matteo Bonini
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 11.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.