Literature DB >> 15583742

Treatment of venous thromboembolism with vitamin K antagonists: patients' health state valuations and treatment preferences.

Mirjam Locadia1, Patrick M M Bossuyt, Peep F M Stalmeier, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Carlo J J van Dongen, Saskia Middeldorp, Ivan Bank, Jan van der Meer, Karly Hamulyák, Martin H Prins.   

Abstract

Determining the optimal duration of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) requires a weighting of the benefits and risks of treatment. The objectives of our study were to investigate patient variability in health state valuations associated with VKA therapy and treatment preferences, and to investigate the extent to which valuations and treatment preferences are associated with prior experience with these health states and other patient characteristics. Valuations of outcomes after VTE scaled from 0 (tantamount to death) to 1 (tantamount to perfect health) were elicited from 53 patients who had experienced VTE, 23 patients who had experienced major bleeding during treatment, and 48 patients with the post-thrombotic syndrome. In addition, patients' treatment preferences were evaluated using treatment trade-off questions. Median health state valuations ranged from 0.33 for 'non-fatal haemorrhagic stroke' to 0.96 for 'no VKA treatment'. Variability between patients was substantial. Patients' treatment preferences also varied: 25% of patients chose cessation of treatment, regardless of the probability of recurrent VTE presented, whereas 23% of patients were never willing to choose cessation of treatment. Differences in valuations and treatment preferences were not associated with type of event experienced. Due to the substantial and unpredictable variability in valuations and treatment preferences, recommendations regarding treatment duration should be tailored to patients' specific values and concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15583742     DOI: 10.1160/TH04-02-0075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  21 in total

Review 1.  Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Samantha MacLean; Sohail Mulla; Elie A Akl; Milosz Jankowski; Per Olav Vandvik; Shanil Ebrahim; Shelley McLeod; Neera Bhatnagar; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Stopping anticoagulant therapy after an unprovoked venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence.

Authors:  John A Heit
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 10.047

5.  Cost effectiveness analysis of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) in the United States.

Authors:  Ang Li; Poorni M Manohar; David A Garcia; Gary H Lyman; Lotte M Steuten
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Different strategies for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for lower-limb immobilisation after injury: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Abdullah Pandor; Daniel Horner; Sarah Davis; Steve Goodacre; John W Stevens; Mark Clowes; Beverley J Hunt; Tim Nokes; Jonathan Keenan; Kerstin de Wit
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban for Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Greece.

Authors:  George Gourzoulidis; Georgia Kourlaba; John Kakisis; Mitiadis Matsagkas; George Giannakoulas; Konstantinos I Gourgoulianis; Theodoros Vassilakopoulos; Nikos Maniadakis
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Cost-effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Clearance of Obtunded Blunt Trauma After a Normal Computed Tomographic Finding.

Authors:  Xiao Wu; Ajay Malhotra; Bertie Geng; Vivek B Kalra; Khalid Abbed; Howard P Forman; Pina Sanelli
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Cost-effectiveness of additional catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  T Enden; S Resch; C White; H S Wik; N E Kløw; P M Sandset
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines.

Authors:  Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Yuan Zhang; Francesca Brundisini; Ivan D Florez; Wojtek Wiercioch; Robby Nieuwlaat; Housne Begum; Carlos A Cuello; Yetiani Roldan; Ru Chen; Chengyi Ding; Rebecca L Morgan; John J Riva; Yuqing Zhang; Rana Charide; Arnav Agarwal; Sara Balduzzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Yasir Rehman; Ignacio Neumann; Nicole Schwab; Tejan Baldeh; Cody Braun; María Francisca Rodríguez; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.