Literature DB >> 15582554

A comparison of different strategies for the construction of amperometric enzyme biosensors using gold nanoparticle-modified electrodes.

M L Mena1, P Yáñez-Sedeño, J M Pingarrón.   

Abstract

A comparison of the analytical performances of several enzyme biosensor designs, based on the use of different tailored gold nanoparticle-modified electrode surfaces, is discussed. Glucose oxidase (GOx) and the redox mediator tetrathiafulvalene were coimmobilized in all cases by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde. The biosensor designs tested were based on the use of (i) colloidal gold (Au(coll)) bound on cysteamine (Cyst) monolayers self-assembled on a gold disk electrode (AuE) and (ii) glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) modified with electrodeposited gold nanoparticles (nAu). The results obtained with these designs were compared with those provided by a GOx/Cyst-AuE and a GOx/MPA-AuE. In the second case (ii), configurations based on direct immobilization of GOx on nAu (GOx/nAu-GCE) or on Cyst or MPA self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) previously bound on gold nanoparticles (GOx/Cyst-nAu-GCE or GOx/MPA-nAu-GCE, respectively) were compared. The analytical characteristics of glucose calibration plots and the kinetic parameters of the enzyme reaction were compared for all of the biosensors tested. The GOx/Au(coll)-Cyst-AuE design showed a sensitivity for glucose determination higher than that achieved with GOx/Cyst-AuE and GOx/Au(coll)-Cyst/Cyst-AuE and similar to that achieved with GOx/MPA-AuE. Moreover, the useful lifetime of one single GOx/Au(coll)-Cyst-AuE was 28 days, remarkably longer than that of the other GOx biosensor designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15582554     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2004.07.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  7 in total

Review 1.  Gold nanoparticles in chemical and biological sensing.

Authors:  Krishnendu Saha; Sarit S Agasti; Chaekyu Kim; Xiaoning Li; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Materiomics for Oral Disease Diagnostics and Personal Health Monitoring: Designer Biomaterials for the Next Generation Biomarkers.

Authors:  Wenjun Zhang; Ming L Wang; Sammy Khalili; Steven W Cranford
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2016-01

3.  Electrochemical processes and mechanistic aspects of field-effect sensors for biomolecules.

Authors:  Weiguo Huang; Abdou Karim Diallo; Jennifer L Dailey; Kalpana Besar; Howard E Katz
Journal:  J Mater Chem C Mater       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 7.393

Review 4.  Electrochemical Biosensors - Sensor Principles and Architectures.

Authors:  Dorothee Grieshaber; Robert MacKenzie; Janos Vörös; Erik Reimhult
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  A chronoamperometric screen printed carbon biosensor based on alkaline phosphatase inhibition for W(IV) determination in water, using 2-phospho-L-ascorbic acid trisodium salt as a substrate.

Authors:  Ana Lorena Alvarado-Gámez; María Asunción Alonso-Lomillo; Olga Domínguez-Renedo; María Julia Arcos-Martínez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Nanomaterials for biosensing applications: a review.

Authors:  Michael Holzinger; Alan Le Goff; Serge Cosnier
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 7.  DNA-Based Biosensors for the Biochemical Analysis: A Review.

Authors:  Yu Hua; Jiaming Ma; Dachao Li; Ridong Wang
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.