AIM: To compare the prophylactic and therapeutic effects of alphaviruses in the same tumor model, we used a DNA-based approach to generate a replicon DNA and recombinant Semliki Forest virus (rSFV) particles expressing P1A, the P815 mastocytoma tumor associated antigen, and compared the immune effect of each vaccine. METHODS: Six to eight-week-old female DBA/2 mice were inoculated with P1A plasmid or viral vaccines. Spleen cells were assayed for antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell activity. Tumor growth or survival rate was observed in preventive and therapeutic experiments, respectively. RESULTS: We found that the rSFV particles prevented tumor growth when delivered prior to innoculation of mice with P815 cells, and more importantly, improved survival when delivered after the initiation of tumor growth. Naked P1A replicon DNA also functioned as a protective and therapeutic vaccine, although with less potency than rSFV particles. Virus particles also elicited a stronger cellular immune response as measured by target cell lysis. CONCLUSION: rSFV particles have stronger specific prophylactic and therapeutic immune effects in mice than replicon DNA-based DNA vaccines, though the latter is more effective than traditional plasmid vectors (e.g. pCI-neo vector).
AIM: To compare the prophylactic and therapeutic effects of alphaviruses in the same tumor model, we used a DNA-based approach to generate a replicon DNA and recombinant Semliki Forest virus (rSFV) particles expressing P1A, the P815 mastocytoma tumor associated antigen, and compared the immune effect of each vaccine. METHODS: Six to eight-week-old female DBA/2 mice were inoculated with P1A plasmid or viral vaccines. Spleen cells were assayed for antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell activity. Tumor growth or survival rate was observed in preventive and therapeutic experiments, respectively. RESULTS: We found that the rSFV particles prevented tumor growth when delivered prior to innoculation of mice with P815 cells, and more importantly, improved survival when delivered after the initiation of tumor growth. Naked P1A replicon DNA also functioned as a protective and therapeutic vaccine, although with less potency than rSFV particles. Virus particles also elicited a stronger cellular immune response as measured by target cell lysis. CONCLUSION:rSFV particles have stronger specific prophylactic and therapeutic immune effects in mice than replicon DNA-based DNA vaccines, though the latter is more effective than traditional plasmid vectors (e.g. pCI-neo vector).