Literature DB >> 15582247

Are repeat biopsies required in men with PSA levels < or =4 ng/ml? A Multiinstitutional Prospective European Study.

Bob Djavan1, Yan Kit Fong, Vincent Ravery, Mesut Remzi, Wolfgang Horninger, Martin Susani, Soren Kreuzer, Laurent Boccon-Gibod, Georg Bartsch, Michael Marberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pathological and biochemical features of prostate cancers detected on repeat biopsies in men with total PSA level between 2.0 and 4 ng/ml were evaluated and compared to those cancers detected on first biopsy.
METHODS: 315 men with PSA level between 2.0 and 4 ng/ml underwent transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsy and two additional transition zone biopsies (Octant Biopsy). All subjects whose biopsy samples were negative for prostate cancer underwent a repeat biopsy after 6 weeks. Those with clinically localized cancers were offered surgery or radiation therapy. Pathological and clinical features of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer on initial and repeat biopsy were compared.
RESULTS: Cancer detection rates on first and second biopsy were 24% (75/315) and 13% (29/224), respectively. Overall, of patients with clinically localized disease (83% of cancers detected), 87% underwent radical prostatectomy, 11% opted for radiation therapy and 2% opted for watchful waiting. Cancers found in the first biopsy group were more multifocal (p = 0.01) while cancers found on second biopsy were more located in the apical-dorsal region (p = 0.003). No significant differences were noted with respect to extracapsular extension, seminal vesical invasion, positive margins, final pathological stage, Gleason score, percentage Gleason grade 4/5, serum PSA and patient age between first and second biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: With an octant biopsy regime, biochemical and pathological features of cancers detected on initial and repeat biopsy in the PSA range 2.0 to 4 ng/ml are comparable in terms of PSA, grade, stage and cancer volume suggesting identical cancer characteristics, thus advocating for a repeat prostate biopsy in case of a negative finding on initial biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15582247     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  11 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for repeat prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Martha K Terris
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  A 12-year follow-up of ANNA/C-TRUS image-targeted biopsies in patients suspicious for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Björn Grabski; Udo Paul; Leif Bäurle; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Prostate cancer diagnostics: innovative imaging in case of multiple negative biopsies.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Core needle biopsy twice negative with rising PSA level. Does imaging help?].

Authors:  T Loch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of prostate cancer for the radiologist.

Authors:  Richard Clements
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Analysis of repeated 24-core saturation prostate biopsy: Inverse association between asymptomatic histological inflammation and prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Tomonori Kato; Akira Komiya; Akihiro Morii; Hiroaki Iida; Takatoshi Ito; Hideki Fuse
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Rising PSA in patients with minor LUTS without evidence of prostatic carcinoma: a missing link?

Authors:  Koenraad van Renterghem; Gommert Van Koeveringe; Philip Van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Dealing with non-cancerous findings on prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Timothy C Brand; Gregory P Thibault; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 9.  A new algorithm in patients with elevated and/or rising prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and negative multisite prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Koenraad van Renterghem; Gommert Van Koeveringe; Ruth Achten; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Prostate Cancer Biomarker Development: National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network Prostate Cancer Collaborative Group Review.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Robin J Leach; Martin G Sanda; Oliver J Semmes
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.