Literature DB >> 15582208

Eye irritation of low-irritant cosmetic formulations: correlation of in vitro results with clinical data and product composition.

Caroline Debbasch1, Catherine Ebenhahn, Nadia Dami, Marc Pericoi, Christine Van den Berghe, Martine Cottin, Gerhard J Nohynek.   

Abstract

Alternative methods to the Draize eye irritation test, such as the hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) or the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) tests, are currently used to evaluate the irritant potential of cosmetic or consumer products. Although, for strong irritants, the results of these tests correlate well with those of the Draize test, they appear to be less suited to identify mild irritants. In order to improve the sensitivity of alternative eye irritation tests, we developed a novel method that uses a human corneal epithelial cell line (CEPI), and the endpoints of cytotoxicity and IL-8 release. Twelve make-up removers were assessed by the HET-CAM, BCOP and CEPI tests, as well as in a clinical in-use test under ophthalmological control after their application to the external eye lid. In addition, we investigated the impact of osmolality and raw material composition on in vitro and clinical results and compared the in vitro results with those of clinical studies. Overall, although HET-CAM results were unrelated to eye discomfort and adverse clinical signs, they correlated mainly with the presence and concentration of surfactants in the test articles. BCOP scores were unrelated to clinical signs, but related mainly to glycol and sodium lactate content and concentration in the test articles. Cytotoxicity in CEPI mainly correlated with presence and concentrations of surfactants, and IL-8 release to clinical signs and/or glycol and sodium lactate concentrations. Overall, IL-8 release appeared to be the most sensitive and reliable endpoint to predict human eye tolerance to mildly irritant products. Although our results suggest that the IL-8 assay appears to be a promising screen for borderline-irritant formulations, further experiments are required to confirm and validate these preliminary results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15582208     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2004.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Eye irritation and chemical eye burns. Review of experimental and clinical studies].

Authors:  A K Cordes; M Frentz; N F Schrage
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Cancer Explant Models.

Authors:  Christian T Stackhouse; George Yancey Gillespie; Christopher D Willey
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  The chicken chorioallantoic membrane model in biology, medicine and bioengineering.

Authors:  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Tatiana Segura; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 9.596

Review 4.  Act on the Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals (K-REACH) and replacement, reduction or refinement best practices.

Authors:  Soojin Ha; Troy Seidle; Kyung-Min Lim
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-19

Review 5.  Investigating the effect of eye cosmetics on the tear film: current insights.

Authors:  Michael Tm Wang; Jennifer P Craig
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2018-04-03

6.  Methotrexate and Cetuximab-Biological Impact on Non-Tumorigenic Models: In Vitro and In Ovo Assessments.

Authors:  Andreea M Kis; Ioana Macasoi; Corina Paul; Matilda Radulescu; Roxana Buzatu; Claudia G Watz; Adelina Cheveresan; Delia Berceanu; Iulia Pinzaru; Stefania Dinu; Aniko Manea; Marioara Poenaru; Claudia Borza; Cristina A Dehelean
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Evaluation of Eye Irritation Potential of Solid Substance with New 3D Reconstructed Human Cornea Model, MCTT HCE(TM).

Authors:  Won-Hee Jang; Kyoung-Mi Jung; Hye-Ri Yang; Miri Lee; Haeng-Sun Jung; Su-Hyon Lee; Miyoung Park; Kyung-Min Lim
Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Development of a curved, stratified, in vitro model to assess ocular biocompatibility.

Authors:  Cameron K Postnikoff; Robert Pintwala; Sara Williams; Ann M Wright; Denise Hileeto; Maud B Gorbet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.