OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the breast and to ascertain its usefulness. STUDY DESIGN: The authors reviewed 1,297 cases of FNA cytology of the breast which were performed at Chonnam National University Hospital from 1999 to 2002. Cytologic diagnoses were compared with histologic diagnoses in 457 cases that underwent both cytologic and histologic examination. RESULTS: Of 1,297 cases, 1,201 (92.6%) were satisfactory and 96 (7.4%) unsatisfactory. Subsequent histologic examination was performed on 291 cases (29.7%) out of 981 "benign" lesions, 28 (73.7%) of 38 "suspicious," 124 (68.1%) of 182 "malignant" and 14 (14.6%) of 96 "unsatisfactory." FNA cytology revealed 77.7% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, 98.4% positive predictive value and 88.0% negative predictive value. Diagnostic accuracy was 91.1%. Of the 291 benign cases on cytology, 35 cases were malignancy on histology. Of the 124 cases reported as malignant, 2 were benign. Interpretive error was the leading cause of false positive diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Although FNA cytology is a useful diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of breast lesions, it should be combined with other diagnostic modalities, such as physical examination, ultrasonography and mammography.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the breast and to ascertain its usefulness. STUDY DESIGN: The authors reviewed 1,297 cases of FNA cytology of the breast which were performed at Chonnam National University Hospital from 1999 to 2002. Cytologic diagnoses were compared with histologic diagnoses in 457 cases that underwent both cytologic and histologic examination. RESULTS: Of 1,297 cases, 1,201 (92.6%) were satisfactory and 96 (7.4%) unsatisfactory. Subsequent histologic examination was performed on 291 cases (29.7%) out of 981 "benign" lesions, 28 (73.7%) of 38 "suspicious," 124 (68.1%) of 182 "malignant" and 14 (14.6%) of 96 "unsatisfactory." FNA cytology revealed 77.7% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, 98.4% positive predictive value and 88.0% negative predictive value. Diagnostic accuracy was 91.1%. Of the 291 benign cases on cytology, 35 cases were malignancy on histology. Of the 124 cases reported as malignant, 2 were benign. Interpretive error was the leading cause of false positive diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Although FNA cytology is a useful diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of breast lesions, it should be combined with other diagnostic modalities, such as physical examination, ultrasonography and mammography.