Literature DB >> 15580601

Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.

Andrea Benedetti1, Michal Abrahamowicz.   

Abstract

Traditionally, confounding by continuous variables is controlled by including a linear or categorical term in a regression model. Residual confounding occurs when the effect of the confounder on the outcome is mis-modelled. A continuous representation of a covariate was previously shown to result in a less biased estimate of the adjusted exposure effect than categorization provided the functional form of the covariate-outcome relationship is correctly specified. However, this is rarely known. In contrast to parametric regression, generalized additive models (GAM) fit a smooth dose-response curve to the data, without requiring a priori knowledge of the functional form. We used simulations to compare parametric multiple logistic regression vs its non-parametric GAM extension in their ability to control for a continuous confounder. We also investigated several issues related to the implementation of GAM in this context, including: (i) selecting the degrees of freedom; and (ii) alternative criteria for inclusion/exclusion of the potential confounder and for choosing between parametric and non-parametric representation of its effect. The impact of the shape and strength of the confounder-disease association, sample size, and the correlation between the confounder and exposure were investigated. Simulations showed that when the confounder has a non-linear association with the outcome, compared to a parametric representation, GAM modelling (i) reduced the mean squared error for the adjusted exposure effect; (ii) avoided inflation of the type I error for testing the exposure effect. When the true confounder-outcome relationship was linear, GAM performed as well as the parametric logistic regression. When modelling a continuous exposure non-parametrically, in the presence of a continuous confounder, our results suggest that assuming a linear effect of the confounder and focussing on the non-linearity of the exposure-outcome relationship leads to spurious findings of non-linearity: joint non-linear modelling is necessary. Overall, our results suggest that the use of GAM to reduce residual confounding offers several improvements over conventional parametric modelling. 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15580601     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  18 in total

Review 1.  Adjustment for continuous confounders: an example of how to prevent residual confounding.

Authors:  Rolf H H Groenwold; Olaf H Klungel; Douglas G Altman; Yolanda van der Graaf; Arno W Hoes; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Flexible modeling improves assessment of prognostic value of C-reactive protein in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  B Gagnon; M Abrahamowicz; Y Xiao; M-E Beauchamp; N MacDonald; G Kasymjanova; H Kreisman; D Small
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Cognitive impairment from early to middle adulthood in patients with affective and nonaffective psychotic disorders.

Authors:  Josephine Mollon; Samuel R Mathias; Emma E M Knowles; Amanda Rodrigue; Marinka M G Koenis; Godfrey D Pearlson; Abraham Reichenberg; Jennifer Barrett; Dominique Denbow; Katrina Aberizk; Molly Zatony; Russell A Poldrack; John Blangero; David C Glahn
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Assessment for the Correlation Between Diabetic Retinopathy and Metabolic Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Qing Sun; Liang Tang; Qiurong Zeng; Mingjun Gu
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.168

5.  Testing the dose-response specification in epidemiology: public health and policy consequences for lead.

Authors:  Stephen J Rothenberg; Jesse C Rothenberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Publication pressure and burn out among Dutch medical professors: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Joeri K Tijdink; Anton C M Vergouwen; Yvo M Smulders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The association between sleep duration and lipid profiles: the NHANES 2013-2014.

Authors:  Abbas Smiley; David King; Jaroslaw Harezlak; Paul Dinh; Aurelian Bidulescu
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2019-06-22

8.  Mortality after infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) diagnosed in the community.

Authors:  J A 'Chris' Delaney; Verena Schneider-Lindner; Paul Brassard; Samy Suissa
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Quality Reporting of Multivariable Regression Models in Observational Studies: Review of a Representative Sample of Articles Published in Biomedical Journals.

Authors:  Jordi Real; Carles Forné; Albert Roso-Llorach; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Daily volume of cases in emergency call centers: construction and validation of a predictive model.

Authors:  Damien Viglino; Aurelien Vesin; Stephane Ruckly; Xavier Morelli; Rémi Slama; Guillaume Debaty; Vincent Danel; Maxime Maignan; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.