Literature DB >> 15580581

Comparing maternal styles in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Mieke De Lathouwers1, Linda Van Elsacker.   

Abstract

Studies on Cercopithecine primate maternal styles, using factor analysis on a set of maternal behaviors, commonly render two factors that describe separate dimensions of maternal behavior: protectiveness and rejection. The aims of this study were to 1) investigate whether this method for determining maternal styles in Cercopithecine species can be applied to bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), 2) determine whether they follow the same pattern, and 3) assess whether species differences in maternal style are apparent. We performed a factor analysis on nine maternal behaviors using data on eight mother-infant pairs of each species. This resulted in three factors: protectiveness, distance, and refusal. Protectiveness is positively correlated with time spent in ventral contact, making contact, approaching, and restraining. Distance is positively related with breaking contact and leaving. Refusal is positively correlated with rejecting and nipple-rejecting. The pattern of protectiveness corresponds with the pattern found in Cercopithecine species, suggesting a high consistency of this dimension across species and higher taxa. The retention of the other two factors indicates that in the Pan species, breaking contact and leaving represent another dimension, apart from rejecting and nipple-rejecting, which usually fall under one dimension in Cercopithecine species. An interspecific comparison of the factor scores for each dimension of maternal behavior reveals that, on average, bonobos and chimpanzees score equally on protectiveness. Scores on distance increase positively with infant age in chimpanzees, and negatively in bonobos, and on average bonobos have higher scores on refusal. These interspecies differences in maternal style are discussed in the light of interspecies differences in infant development, infant vulnerability to aggression, interbirth intervals, and female sociality. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15580581     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mirror self-recognition: a review and critique of attempts to promote and engineer self-recognition in primates.

Authors:  James R Anderson; Gordon G Gallup
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  The development of an instrument to measure global dimensions of maternal care in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  K McCormack; B R Howell; D Guzman; C Villongco; K Pears; H Kim; M R Gunnar; M M Sanchez
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Comparing infant and juvenile behavior in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): a preliminary study.

Authors:  Mieke De Lathouwers; Linda Van Elsacker
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 2.163

4.  Individual variation and plasticity in the infant-directed communication of orang-utan mothers.

Authors:  Marlen Fröhlich; Carel P van Schaik; Maria A van Noordwijk; Ulrich Knief
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Maternal effects on offspring growth indicate post-weaning juvenile dependence in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus).

Authors:  Liran Samuni; Patrick Tkaczynski; Tobias Deschner; Therese Löhrrich; Roman M Wittig; Catherine Crockford
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Should I stay or should I go? Initiation of joint travel in mother-infant dyads of two chimpanzee communities in the wild.

Authors:  Marlen Fröhlich; Roman M Wittig; Simone Pika
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.084

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.