Literature DB >> 15580036

Vacuum-assisted fascial closure for patients with abdominal trauma.

Patrick A Stone1, Stephen M Hass, Sarah K Flaherty, John A DeLuca, Frank C Lucente, Roberto E Kusminsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Massive fluid resuscitation often is required for patients with intraabdominal trauma. Subsequently, fascial closure is not always possible in this subset of patients. Under these circumstances, an initial step can be the use of a temporary abdominal closure method. The authors currently use a vacuum-assisted closure to manage the open abdomen for some of their trauma patients. They present their experience over the past 3 years.
METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2002, 48 trauma patients were treated with temporary abdominal closure using a vacuum-assisted dressing. The ultimate management of the abdominal defect, the serum lactate levels measured in the emergency department, and the fluid balance at the last attempt to accomplish fascial closure were reviewed.
RESULTS: Delayed fascial closure was achieved in 23 (71.9%) of 32 patients who survived to discharge (26 of 48, 54.2%). Of the 32 patients who survived to discharge, 9 (28.1%) required an alternative closure, most often a split-thickness skin graft. Of the 16 patients who died before discharge, 8 died within 24 hours after admission. Whereas 5 of the 16 deaths occurred after delayed abdominal closure, 11 patients died without abdominal closure. Emergency department serum lactate levels above 8 mg/dL show a positive correlation with in-hospital mortality (6 of 16 patients; 38%; p = 0.001) and mortality within 24 hours of admission (6 of 8 patients; 75%; p = 0.003). Admission lactate levels were not associated with the type of closure achieved. However, primary closure was associated with a significant decrease in lactate levels during the first 12 hours. Complications included five abdominal abscesses, two enterocutaneous fistulas, and one split-thickness skin graft failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring temporary abdominal closure have a significant in-hospital mortality rate of 33%. Delayed primary closure with vacuum assistance was achieved for 71.9% of the surviving patients. Maintaining a negative or total positive fluid balance of less than 20 L before the last attempted fascial closure improves successful closure rates, as seen in 19 of 22 patients (86.4%). The vacuum-assisted closure technique also enabled successful primary closure for two patients with extreme delay (>8 days). Elevated serum lactate levels are significantly correlated with early and in-hospital mortality. A significant decrease in lactate level during the first 12 hours is associated with achievement of primary closure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15580036     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000149248.02598.9e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  20 in total

1.  Intra-abdominal vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) after necrosectomy for acute necrotising pancreatitis: preliminary experience.

Authors:  D Sermoneta; M Di Mugno; P L Spada; C Lodoli; M E Carvelli; S C Magalini; C Cavicchioni; M G Bocci; F Martorelli; M G Brizi; D Gui
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  [Abdominal compartment syndrome: significance, diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  A Schachtrupp; M Jansen; P Bertram; R Kuhlen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Vacuum-assisted closure of postoperative abdominal wounds: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sriram Subramonia; Sarah Pankhurst; Brian J Rowlands; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Treatment of the open abdomen with the commercially available vacuum-assisted closure system in patients with abdominal sepsis: low primary closure rate.

Authors:  D Wondberg; H J Larusson; U Metzger; A Platz; U Zingg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Topical negative pressure wound therapy: a review of its role and guidelines for its use in the management of acute wounds.

Authors:  Estas Bovill; Paul E Banwell; Luc Teot; Elof Eriksson; Colin Song; Jim Mahoney; Ronny Gustafsson; Raymund Horch; Anand Deva; Ian Whitworth
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  [Abdominal vacuum device with open abdomen].

Authors:  P Oetting; B Rau; P M Schlag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction--a novel technique for late closure of the open abdomen.

Authors:  Ulf Petersson; Stefan Acosta; Martin Björck
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Use of chorioamniotic membrane instead of bogota bag in open abdomen: how i do it?

Authors:  Sakir Tekin; Ahmet Tekin; Tevfik Kucukkartallar; Murat Cakir; Adil Kartal
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Negative pressure wound therapy: experience in 45 dogs.

Authors:  Kathryn A Pitt; Bryden J Stanley
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.495

10.  Vacuum-assisted closure device enhances recovery of critically ill patients following emergency surgical procedures.

Authors:  Stefano Batacchi; Stefania Matano; Alessandra Nella; Giovanni Zagli; Manuela Bonizzoli; Andrea Pasquini; Valentina Anichini; Valentina Tucci; Giuseppe Manca; Kevin Ban; Andrea Valeri; Adriano Peris
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.