Literature DB >> 15579765

Growth hormone therapy in children after cranial/craniospinal radiation therapy: sexually dimorphic outcomes.

Shulamit E Lerner1, Guo Jun Michael Huang, Donald McMahon, Charles A Sklar, Sharon E Oberfield.   

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) to the craniospinal region in childhood affects final height. The use of GH treatment (GHRx) in children after cranial or craniospinal RT results in variable improvement in final height. Nineteen children (12 males and 7 females) with tumors of the head, treated with cranial or craniospinal RT and subsequently with GHRx, were assessed for final height. Two outcome measures of efficacy of GHRx were used: Y1 = final height SD score (SDS) corrected for genetic potential, using midparental sex-adjusted target height (SATH) SDS, and Y2 = change in height SDS from predicted final height SDS pre-GHRx to actual final height SDS post-GHRx. The median age at diagnosis was 5.4 yr, the median RT to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis was 40 Gy, the median spinal RT dose in 13 of 19 of the subjects treated was 36 Gy, and the median years post-RT to GHRx was 4.8 yr. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used in 12 of 19 patients. All but one (optic glioma) had a lesion anatomically distant from the suprasellar region. The effects of age at diagnosis, sex, L-T4 or GnRH agonist use, conventional vs. hyperfractionated RT, spinal RT, dose of spinal or cranial RT, chemotherapy, peak stimulated GH, dose and duration of GHRx, age at GHRx, time interval between RT and GHRx initiation, bone age, and height SDS at the start of GHRx were also assessed. Y1girls best correlated with younger age at diagnosis and im vs. sc GHRx. Y2girls best correlated with delayed bone age and younger age at diagnosis [Y1girls = -9.95 + 0.38 (age in years at diagnosis) + 3.11[GH method (1 = i.m.; 2 = s.c.)]; r2 = 0.898; P = 0.02; Y2girls = -3.54 + 1.8 (bone age - age in years) + 0.334 (age at diagnosis in years); r2= 0.956; P = 0.02]. Both Y1boys and Y2boys were strongly associated with spinal RT and younger age at diagnosis or treatment [Y1boys = -11.22 + 4.65 [spinal RT (1 = yes; 2 = no)] + 0.396 (age in years at diagnosis); r2= 0.64, P = 0.01; Y2boys = -6.32 + 0.23 (age in years at GH start) + 1.75 [spinal RT (1 = yes; 2 = no)]; r2= 0.646; P < 0.01]. This small historical cohort underscores that final stature is significantly reduced when immature bones are exposed to ionizing radiation. Intramuscular vs. sc use of GHRx is likely to be simply a surrogate marker for earlier methods of treatment. Of note, spinal RT did not significantly impact girls' final heights, whereas in boys, spinal RT strongly predicted ultimate short stature and a reduced response to GHRx. This sexually dichotomous response may be due in part to the greater percentage of spinal growth remaining for boys vs. girls throughout childhood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15579765     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-1515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric brain tumor treatment: growth consequences and their management.

Authors:  Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Adda Grimberg
Journal:  Pediatr Endocrinol Rev       Date:  2010-09

2.  Gonadotropin-dependent precocious puberty: neoplastic causes and endocrine considerations.

Authors:  Matthew D Stephen; Peter E Zage; Steven G Waguespack
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2011-03-06

3.  Growth patterns and the use of growth hormone in the mucopolysaccharidoses.

Authors:  L E Polgreen; B S Miller
Journal:  J Pediatr Rehabil Med       Date:  2010

4.  Final height and insulin-like growth factor-1 in children with medulloblastoma treated with growth hormone.

Authors:  Hyun Wook Chae; Young Seok Park; Dong Seok Kim; Ah Reum Kwon; Ho-Seong Kim; Duk Hee Kim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Late vertebral side effects in long-term survivors of irradiated childhood brain tumor.

Authors:  Miro-Pekka Jussila; Tiina Remes; Julia Anttonen; Arja Harila-Saari; Jaakko Niinimäki; Tytti Pokka; Päivi Koskenkorva; Anna Sutela; Sanna Toiviainen-Salo; Pekka Arikoski; Pekka Riikonen; Mikko Arola; Päivi Lähteenmäki; Kirsti Sirkiä; Heikki Rantala; Maria Suo-Palosaari; Marja Ojaniemi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Response to GH Treatment After Radiation Therapy Depends on Location of Irradiation.

Authors:  Susan R Rose; Martin Carlsson; Adda Grimberg; Ferah Aydin; Assunta Albanese; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega; Cecilia Camacho-Hubner
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.958

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.