Literature DB >> 15579345

Ability of veterinary pathologists to diagnose classical swine fever from clinical signs and gross pathological findings.

A R W Elbers1, J H Vos, A Bouma, J A Stegeman.   

Abstract

Clinical signs recorded in a classical swine fever (CSF)-suspect situation and the results of the subsequent post-mortem examination (PME) from swine submitted to post-mortem during the 1997-1998 CSF epidemic in the Netherlands, were presented in an experiment as anonymous cases (without knowledge of the actual infection status of the submission) to five veterinary pathologists for their judgment: CSF-suspect or non-suspect. It was presented to them in two hypothetical situations: country was free of CSF for 5 years and CSF was detected in the country 2 weeks ago. Subsequently, their judgment was compared to the gold standard (infection status of the submission on the basis of an immunofluoresence assay on tissue samples) and the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of clinical diagnosis was estimated. Furthermore, intra- and inter-pathologist agreement on pathological diagnosis was measured. Adding information on clinical signs to information on PME resulted in a significant increase in median Se and a significant decrease in median Sp for a clinical judgment by pathologists. Also, median Se was significantly higher-and Sp significantly lower-for a clinical judgment by pathologists in a situation in which CSF was detected 2 weeks ago in the country compared to the situation in which the country had been free of CSF for 5 years. Apparently, the internal threshold of pathologists is severely adjusted depending on the actual disease situation in a country. Intra-rater agreement ranged from fair to almost perfect for a clinical diagnosis on the basis of PME. There was considerable variation between pathologists, especially if clinical diagnosis was based on the combined information on PME and clinical signs observed in the herd. Inter-rater agreement was substantial for the diagnosis based on information on PME. Inter-rater agreement was considerably lower for the diagnosis based on the combined information on PME and clinical signs observed in the herd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15579345     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  4 in total

1.  Diagnosis of classical swine fever virus in a limited resource setting: the influence of pig breed on methodology and sample selection.

Authors:  S Khounsy; L J Gleeson; D Van Aken; H A Westbury; S D Blacksell
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Development and evaluation of a rapid immunomagnetic bead assay for the detection of classical swine fever virus antigen.

Authors:  James V Conlan; Syseng Khounsy; Stuart D Blacksell; Christopher J Morrissy; Colin R Wilks; Laurence J Gleeson
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Simulated detection of syndromic classical swine fever on a Finnish pig-breeding farm.

Authors:  S M Raulo; T Lyytikäinen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Vulnerability of the British swine industry to classical swine fever.

Authors:  Thibaud Porphyre; Carla Correia-Gomes; Margo E Chase-Topping; Kokouvi Gamado; Harriet K Auty; Ian Hutchinson; Aaron Reeves; George J Gunn; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.