Literature DB >> 15579271

Sex differences in the relative lengths of metacarpals and metatarsals in gorillas and chimpanzees.

Dennis McFadden1, Mary S Bracht.   

Abstract

Sex differences other than the simple dimorphism in size were documented for the metapodials of two primate species. Lengths of metacarpals and metatarsals were obtained from the skeletons of 64 gorillas and 42 chimpanzees. Length ratios were constructed for all possible pairings of the five bones in each individual hand and foot. For both species, several of these length ratios exhibited substantial differences between the sexes. Body size was not the basis for these sex differences; when specimens of similar size were compared, the sex differences remained. In humans, length ratios for the fingers and toes also have previously been demonstrated to exhibit sex differences, and the length ratio for the index and ring fingers (the 2D:4D ratio) has been shown to correlate with various medical conditions. Various facts suggest that length ratios in human digits are associated with androgen exposure, probably during prenatal development. For gorillas, the metacarpal length ratio showing the largest sex difference was 4Mc:5Mc in both hands, and the metatarsal length ratio showing the largest sex difference was 1Mt:2Mt in the left foot. Sex differences in length ratios also existed for chimpanzees, but they were generally smaller than for gorillas. Apparently, both gorillas and chimpanzees are affected by developmental mechanisms, possibly androgenic mechanisms, similar to those in humans. Analyses of previous measurements [Susman, R.L., 1979 Comparative and functional morphology of hominoid fingers. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 50, 215-236] revealed that all components of the rays are not affected equally by whatever mechanisms are responsible for the sex differences in length ratios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15579271     DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Behav        ISSN: 0018-506X            Impact factor:   3.587


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of the 2D:4D ratio in aggression-related injuries in children attending a paediatric emergency department.

Authors:  D E O'Briain; P H Dawson; J C Kelly; P Connolly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Sex and race differences in the relative lengths of metacarpals and metatarsals in human skeletons.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Mary S Bracht
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Anxiety, sex-linked behaviors, and digit ratios (2D:4D).

Authors:  Milagros Evardone; Gerianne M Alexander
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2007-10-18

4.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the digit ratio 2D:4D--relationships with body size and microhabitat use in iguanian lizards.

Authors:  Camilla M Gomes; Tiana Kohlsdorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sexual Dimorphism in Digit Ratios Derived from Dorsal Digit Length among Adults and Children.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Martin Voracek; Maharaj Singh
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Biomechanics of the human thumb and the evolution of dexterity.

Authors:  Fotios Alexandros Karakostis; Daniel Haeufle; Ioanna Anastopoulou; Konstantinos Moraitis; Gerhard Hotz; Vangelis Tourloukis; Katerina Harvati
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Digit ratio (2Dratio4D) differences between 20 strains of inbred mice.

Authors:  Reginia H Y Yan; Mark Bunning; Douglas Wahlsten; Peter L Hurd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Early-to-mid gestation fetal testosterone increases right hand 2D:4D finger length ratio in polycystic ovary syndrome-like monkeys.

Authors:  Andrew D Abbott; Ricki J Colman; Ross Tiefenthaler; Daniel A Dumesic; David H Abbott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sex Differences in Rhesus Monkeys' Digit Ratio (2D:4D Ratio) and Its Association With Maternal Social Dominance Rank.

Authors:  Alexander Baxter; Elizabeth K Wood; Parker Jarman; Ashley N Cameron; John P Capitanio; J Dee Higley
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.558

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.