Literature DB >> 15579171

Cortico-basal ganglia pathways are essential for the recall of well-established visuomotor associations.

Philip D Nixon1, Kathryn R McDonald, Patricia M Gough, Iona H Alexander, Richard E Passingham.   

Abstract

Recent human neuroimaging studies, supported by lesion studies with nonhuman primates, have suggested that learning arbitrary associations between sensory cues and behavioural responses requires interactions between the infero-temporal, prefrontal and premotor cortices. We directly tested the hypothesis suggested from our neuroimaging experiments that functional links between the basal ganglia and premotor cortex are involved in the process via which task performance becomes automatic. We made unilateral excitotoxic lesions, centred on the internal pallidum, in four macaques previously given extensive experience on the associations between nonspatial visual cues and movements of a joystick. The basal ganglia lesion was later combined with a premotor cortical lesion in the opposite hemisphere so as to interrupt the connections between them. Three of the animals were subsequently found to be impaired in relearning pre-operatively acquired associations; they eventually succeeded but made three-times as many errors. A fourth animal was unimpaired but its premotor cortex lesion was later found to be incomplete. Response times were only marginally increased and the learning of novel associations appeared relatively unaffected by these lesions. As a control, the effects of a unilateral premotor cortex lesion were assessed with two additional animals but this lesion did not result in a relearning impairment. We therefore suggest that when visuomotor associations have become well established through over-training, performance depends on connections between the basal ganglia and premotor cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15579171     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03788.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  19 in total

1.  Striatal and medial temporal lobe functional interactions during visuomotor associative learning.

Authors:  Aaron T Mattfeld; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Comparison of population activity in the dorsal premotor cortex and putamen during the learning of arbitrary visuomotor mappings.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Peter J Brasted; Steven P Wise
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cue familiarity is represented in monkey medial prefrontal cortex during visuomotor association learning.

Authors:  M Inase; B-M Li; I Takashima; T Iijima
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cerebral changes during performance of overlearned arbitrary visuomotor associations.

Authors:  Meike J Grol; Floris P de Lange; Frans A J Verstraten; Richard E Passingham; Ivan Toni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Conditional visuo-motor learning and dimension reduction.

Authors:  Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Hélène Frankowska; Martine Meunier; Pierre-Arnaud Coquelin; Driss Boussaoud
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2006-01-28

6.  Spatial representation of overlearned arbitrary visuomotor associations.

Authors:  Meike J Grol; Ivan Toni; Mireille Lock; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Functional contributions and interactions between the human hippocampus and subregions of the striatum during arbitrary associative learning and memory.

Authors:  Aaron T Mattfeld; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Writer's cramp: increased dorsal premotor activity during intended writing.

Authors:  Cathérine C S Delnooz; Rick C Helmich; W P Medendorp; Bart P C Van de Warrenburg; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Cognitive neural prosthetics.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Eun Jung Hwang; Grant H Mulliken
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 10.  How good is the macaque monkey model of the human brain?

Authors:  Richard Passingham
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.