Literature DB >> 15578549

An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study.

William T Long1, Lawrence D Dorr, Vlad Gendelman.   

Abstract

This study reviews the clinical performance of 161 hip arthroplasties (154 patients) with the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation and an uncemented modular acetabular component. Between 1995 and 2002 clinical evaluation and radiographic follow-up of patients included Harris hip scores, patient self-assessment, and radiographs. Twelve operative site complications (7.5%) included 6 revision operations, (3.7%) and 3 other complications (1.9%) not needing reoperation. Six revision operations (3.7%) included 1 femoral revision for aseptic loosening (0.06%) and 5 acetabular revisions (3.1%). One cup revision was for recurrent dislocation, 1 for disassociation of the acetabular insert from the cup, 1 for infection, and 2 for unexplained pain. Histologic evidence did not support the diagnosis of metal hypersensitivity in either case of unexplained pain, and 1 had relief following spine surgery. A focal radiolucency, identified as calcar resorption, was observed in 9 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578549     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  16 in total

Review 1.  Survival of hard-on-hard bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Siraj A Sayeed; Aaron J Johnson; Thomas P Schmalzried; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Revision arthroplasty: an update.

Authors:  D Williams; A Taylor; P McLardy-Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component.

Authors:  William T Long; Manish Dastane; Michael J Harris; Zhinian Wan; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Revisions of monoblock metal-on-metal THAs have high early complication rates.

Authors:  Louis S Stryker; Susan M Odum; Thomas K Fehring; Bryan D Springer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Cemented metal-on-metal total hip replacement with 28-mm head: prospective, long-term, clinical, radiological and metal ions data.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Malek; Sheethal Prasad Patange Subba Rao; Narendra Kumar Rath; U N Mallya
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-12-19

6.  A painful soft tissue mass secondary to impingement of a metal on polyethylene bearing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Griffiths-Jones William; Williams Daniel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-20

Review 7.  The clinical performance of metal-on-metal as an articulation surface in total hip replacement.

Authors:  William T Long
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

8.  Predictors of participation in sports after hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel H Williams; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  2008 John Charnley award: metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial.

Authors:  C Anderson Engh; Steven J MacDonald; Supatra Sritulanondha; Abigail Thompson; Douglas Naudie; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  MRI predicts ALVAL and tissue damage in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danyal H Nawabi; Stephanie Gold; Steven Lyman; Kara Fields; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.