Literature DB >> 15578473

Time to tracheal extubation after coronary artery surgery with isoflurane, sevoflurane, or target-controlled propofol anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Francis C Parker1, David A Story, Stephanie Poustie, Guoming Liu, Larry McNicol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if anesthesia with sevoflurane or target-controlled propofol reduced the time to tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with isoflurane anesthesia.
DESIGN: A 3-arm (isoflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol), randomized, controlled trial with patients and intensive care staff blinded to the drug allocation.
SETTING: A single, tertiary referral hospital affiliated with the University of Melbourne. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred sixty elective coronary artery surgery patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either isoflurane (control group, 0.5%-2% end-tidal concentration), sevoflurane (1%-4% end-tidal concentration), or target-controlled infusion of propofol (1-8 microg/mL plasma target concentration) as part of a balanced, standardized anesthetic technique including 15 microg/kg of fentanyl.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was time to tracheal extubation. The median time to tracheal extubation for the propofol group was 10.25 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 8.08-12.75), the sevoflurane group 9.17 hours (IQR 6.25-11.25), and the isoflurane group 7.67 hours (IQR 6.25-9.42). Intraoperatively, the propofol group required less vasopressor (p = 0.002) and more vasodilator therapy (nitroglycerin p = 0.01, nitroprusside p = 0.002). There was no difference among the groups in time to intensive care unit discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The median time to tracheal extubation was significantly longer for the target-controlled propofol group. A significantly greater number in this group required the use of a vasodilator to control intraoperative hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578473     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  3 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of the cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane versus propofol during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Feng Li; Yuan Yuan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 2.  The Impact of Volatile Anesthetic Choice on Postoperative Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andres Zorrilla-Vaca; Rafael A Núñez-Patiño; Valentina Torres; Yudy Salazar-Gomez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Comparing cardiac troponin levels using sevoflurane and isoflurane in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hossein Hosseinifard; Nashmil Ghadimi; Sara Kaveh; Hossein Shabaninejad; Alaadine Lijassi; Rasoul Azarfarin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2020-02-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.