Literature DB >> 15578406

Determinants of influenza vaccination, 2003-2004: shortages, fallacies and disparities.

Timothy F Jones1, L Amanda Ingram, Allen S Craig, William Schaffner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influenza outbreak of 2003-2004 received substantial media attention, including widespread reports of a severe season and vaccine shortages. Understanding the determinants of vaccine receipt is important for guiding immunization policies.
METHODS: From February through June 2004, we administered a structured telephone survey to Tennessee residents, using random-digit dialing methodology.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 4028 persons, of whom 2077 (52%) had received influenza vaccination during the previous outbreak season. Of these 2077 vaccine recipients, 63% received vaccine at a private medical clinic, 14% at a workplace, 11% at a health department, and 7% at a pharmacy. Three-fourths of respondents reported a risk factor for which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends vaccination; of those, 41% went unvaccinated, including 26% who had seen a medical provider for other reasons during the influenza season. More than 40% of persons aged >or=50, more than half of health care workers, and 70% of pregnant women were not immunized. Blacks, rural residents, and lower-income respondents were significantly less likely to be immunized than were comparison groups. Of respondents who were vaccinated, 6% reported difficulties obtaining vaccination (most commonly, they reported that vaccine was not readily available). One-fourth of unvaccinated persons had been offered vaccination but had declined it; of these, 35% thought it unnecessary and 33% believed it would make them ill. Of those not vaccinated, 8% reported requesting vaccination but not receiving it, most commonly because it was unavailable.
CONCLUSIONS: Many barriers contribute to disparities in rates of influenza vaccination, of which inadequate supply is only one component. Myths regarding influenza vaccination persist tenaciously. A multifaceted approach to increasing immunization rates is critical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578406     DOI: 10.1086/427153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  14 in total

1.  Adult preferences for influenza vaccines with lower likelihood of side effects.

Authors:  Paul V Effler; Stephania Tomlin; Sarah Joyce; Donna B Mak
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Determinants of influenza vaccination among a large adult population in Quebec.

Authors:  Geneviève Baron; Virginie Gosselin; Geneviève Petit; Maryse Guay; Arnaud Gagneur
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The benefits to all of ensuring equal and timely access to influenza vaccines in poor communities.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Shawn T Brown; Rachel R Bailey; Richard K Zimmerman; Margaret A Potter; Sarah M McGlone; Philip C Cooley; John J Grefenstette; Shanta M Zimmer; William D Wheaton; Sandra Crouse Quinn; Ronald E Voorhees; Donald S Burke
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Disability and receipt of clinical preventive services among women.

Authors:  Wenhui Wei; Patricia A Findley; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

5.  An economic model assessing the value of microneedle patch delivery of the seasonal influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Sarah M Bartsch; Mercy Mvundura; Courtney Jarrahian; Kristina M Zapf; Kathleen Marinan; Angela R Wateska; Bill Snyder; Savitha Swaminathan; Erica Jacoby; James J Norman; Mark R Prausnitz; Darin Zehrung
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  The anti-vaccination movement and resistance to allergen-immunotherapy: a guide for clinical allergists.

Authors:  Jason Behrmann
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.406

7.  Reduced reaction frequencies with repeated inactivated or live-attenuated influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Suzanne E Ohmit; Jonathan Gross; John C Victor; Arnold S Monto
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Increasing influenza vaccination in New York City taxi drivers: A community driven approach.

Authors:  Francesca Gany; Rohini Rau-Murthy; Imran Mujawar
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Factors associated with influenza vaccine uptake in older adults living in the community in Singapore.

Authors:  L W Ang; J Cutter; L James; K T Goh
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.434

10.  The 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination in France: who accepted to receive the vaccine and why?

Authors:  Jocelyn Raude; Anne-Laure Caille-Brillet; Michel Setbon
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2010-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.