Susan G Butler1, Gregory N Postma, Eileen Fischer. 1. Center for Voice and Swallowing Disorders, Department of Otolaryngology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1034, USA. sbutler@wfubmc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The effects of viscosity, taste, and nectar-thick liquid bolus volume on swallowing apnea duration (SAD) were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Twenty-two adults, comprised of 10 males and 12 females, participated. SAD was assessed via nasal airflow during swallow conditions of viscosity (thin liquid, thick liquid, and puree), taste (water, apple juice, lemon concentrate), and nectar-thick liquid bolus volumes (5, 10, 15, and 20 mL) across three trials. RESULTS: A significant main effect of nectar-thick liquid bolus volume was found (P < 0.05). Viscosity and taste were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: SAD increased with increases in bolus volume; however, neither changes in bolus viscosity nor changes in taste affected SAD. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that since viscosity was not significant, the normative data previously published (by this PI) with 60 healthy adults stratified by age and gender can be utilized for comparison to disordered swallowing without regard to the bolus viscosity being used. EBM RATING: D.
OBJECTIVE: The effects of viscosity, taste, and nectar-thick liquid bolus volume on swallowing apnea duration (SAD) were examined. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Twenty-two adults, comprised of 10 males and 12 females, participated. SAD was assessed via nasal airflow during swallow conditions of viscosity (thin liquid, thick liquid, and puree), taste (water, apple juice, lemon concentrate), and nectar-thick liquid bolus volumes (5, 10, 15, and 20 mL) across three trials. RESULTS: A significant main effect of nectar-thick liquid bolus volume was found (P < 0.05). Viscosity and taste were not significant. CONCLUSIONS:SAD increased with increases in bolus volume; however, neither changes in bolus viscosity nor changes in taste affected SAD. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that since viscosity was not significant, the normative data previously published (by this PI) with 60 healthy adults stratified by age and gender can be utilized for comparison to disordered swallowing without regard to the bolus viscosity being used. EBM RATING: D.
Authors: Teresa Pitts; Melanie J Rose; Ashley N Mortensen; Ivan Poliacek; Christine M Sapienza; Bruce G Lindsey; Kendall F Morris; Paul W Davenport; Donald C Bolser Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Alyssa Huff; Trevor A Day; Mason English; Mitchell D Reed; Shaelynn Zouboules; Gurkarn Saran; Jack K Leacy; Carli Mann; Joel D B Peltonen; Ken D O'Halloran; Mingma T Sherpa; Teresa Pitts Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Kentaro Okuno; Kanji Nohara; Etsuko Takai; Takayoshi Sakai; John A Fleetham; Najib T Ayas; Alan A Lowe; Fernanda R Almeida Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: D H McFarland; B Martin-Harris; A-J Fortin; K Humphries; E Hill; K Armeson Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 1.931