Literature DB >> 15577341

Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002.

Rod J Rohrich1, Amanda A Gosman, Spencer A Brown, Prasanthi Tonadapu, Barbara Foster.   

Abstract

The purpose of this survey was to assess the current trends in breast reduction techniques and to compare satisfaction rates and complications associated with traditional incision and limited incision techniques. In September of 2002, a breast reduction survey was sent to 1500 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 554 of the members returned the survey. Questions elicited categorical answers, and the data were evaluated using the chi-square test and the comparison of two proportions. The results showed that 56 percent of the respondents use only the inferior pedicle and Wise pattern techniques, whereas 6.9 percent of the respondents use only the limited incision techniques. Physician satisfaction was rated as 4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) for both the limited incision and traditional incision groups. Patient satisfaction was rated as 4 for the limited incision group and as 5 for the traditional incision group. This difference in patient satisfaction per surgeon was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The traditional group reported a lower complication rate than did the limited incision group (p < 0.05). The most frequent complications for the traditional incision group were compared with those of the limited incision group. Practice profiles, liposuction, and opinions regarding future changes in breast surgery were also analyzed. The majority of surgeons reported that they did not anticipate changing their practices to accommodate advances in limited incision techniques; however, 89 percent reported that the new limited incision techniques and liposuction are trends that are here to stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15577341     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000142480.27748.9e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  15 in total

1.  Practice profiles in breast reduction: a survey among Canadian plastic surgeons.

Authors:  Rebecca A Nelson; Shannon M Colohan; Leif J Sigurdson; Don H Lalonde
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

2.  The arterial supply of the nipple areola complex (NAC) and its relations: an analysis of angiographic CT imaging for breast pedicle design.

Authors:  Aaron D Stirling; Conor P Murray; Mark A Lee
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Hyperplastic breast anomalies in the female adolescent breast.

Authors:  Erik M Wolfswinkel; Valerie Lemaine; William M Weathers; Chuma J Chike-Obi; Amy S Xue; Lior Heller
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  The Paisley Pattern Breast Reduction.

Authors:  Devra B Becker
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 0.947

5.  Evaluation of long-term breast shape in inferior versus superomedial pedicle reduction mammoplasty: a comparative study.

Authors:  Gianluca Sapino; Daniel Haselbach; William Watfa; Julien Baudoin; Jérôme Martineau; David Guillier; Pietro Giovanni di Summa
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 6.  Mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty pedicles and skin resection patterns.

Authors:  Corrine Wong; Megan Vucovich; Rod Rohrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-09-08

7.  All Seasons Vertical Augmentation Mastopexy: A Simple Algorithm, Clinical Experience, and Patient-reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-12-27

8.  A versatile breast reduction technique: conical plicated central U shaped (COPCUs) mammaplasty.

Authors:  Eray Copcu
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2009-07-03

9.  A New Reduction Mastopexy Design for Young Women: Snowman Pattern.

Authors:  Yakup Cil; Atacan Emre Kocman
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07

10.  Reduction mammoplasty operative techniques for improved outcomes in the treatment of gigantomastia.

Authors:  Brent R Degeorge; David L Colen; Alexander F Mericli; David B Drake
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.