Literature DB >> 15577337

Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity.

Chih-Hung Huang1, Hung-Chi Chen, Yau-Lin Huang, Samir Mardini, Guan-Ming Feng.   

Abstract

The radial forearm flap is commonly used for reconstruction of tongue defects following tumor extirpation. This flap is easy to harvest and offers thin tissue with large-caliber vessels. However, its use leaves behind a conspicuous aesthetic deformity in the forearm and requires the sacrifice of a major artery of that limb, the radial artery. The anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap has found clinical applications in the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects requiring thin tissue. More recently, in a thinned form, the anterolateral thigh flap has been used for reconstructing defects of the tongue with functional results equivalent to that of the radial forearm flap. For the reconstruction of tongue defects, these two flaps could provide similar soft-tissue coverage, but they seem to result in different donor-site appearances. The donor site is closed primarily, leaving only a linear scar that is inconspicuous with normal clothing, and no functional deficit is left behind in the thigh. Thus, for the supply of flaps for tongue defects, a comparison between the radial forearm flap and the anterolateral thigh flap donor sites is provided in this study. Between December of 2000 and August of 2002, 41 patients who underwent reconstruction of defects of the tongue using either a radial forearm flap or an anterolateral thigh flap were evaluated. The focus was on the evaluation of the functional and aesthetic outcome of the donor site after harvesting these flaps for the purpose of reconstructing either total or partial tongue defects. Finally, a comparison was performed between the donor sites of the two flaps. The disadvantages of the radial forearm flap include the conspicuous unattractive scar in the forearm region, pain, numbness, and the sacrifice of a major artery of the limb. In some patients, the donor-site scar of the forearm acted as a social stigma, preventing these patients from leading a normal life. In contrast, the anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap, after thinning, achieved the same results in reconstructing defects of the tongue without the associated donor-site morbidity. Most importantly, the donor site in the thigh could be closed primarily in almost all patients without any functional deficit. The thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap is a viable substitute for the radial forearm flap when reconstructing defects of the tongue. The results achieved are similar to those of the radial forearm flap, and the donor-site morbidity is significantly decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15577337     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000142476.36975.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  25 in total

1.  Multi-digit contracture release using medial sural artery perforator flap with syndactylization-desyndactylization method.

Authors:  F Eren; S Oksuz; H Karagöz; C Melikoğlu; E Ulkur
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Functional and esthetic assessment of radial forearm flap donor site repaired with split thickness skin graft.

Authors:  Jong-Ho Lee; Mohammad S Alrashdan; Su-Gon Kim; Jae-Seok Rim; Samir Jabaiti; Myung-Jin Kim; Soung-Min Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the head and neck: radial forearm flap or anterolateral thigh flap?

Authors:  Wei-Wei Liu; Hao Li; Zhu-Ming Guo; Quan Zhang; An-Kui Yang; Xue-Kui Liu; Ming Song
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Infrahyoid myofascial flap for tongue reconstruction.

Authors:  Jochen P Windfuhr; Stephan Remmert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of Donor Site Morbidity Following a Graft of the Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus Primary Fascial Repair After ALT Flap Harvesting.

Authors:  Sun Je Kim; Heesang Yang; Chungmin Shin; Youngwoong Choi; Sang-Ha Oh
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 0.558

6.  A systematic review of anterolateral thigh flap donor site morbidity.

Authors:  Jessica Collins; Olubimpe Ayeni; Achilleas Thoma
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2012

7.  Anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap vs. radial forearm free-flap in oral and oropharyngeal reconstruction: an analysis of 48 flaps.

Authors:  A Camaioni; A Loreti; V Damiani; M Bellioni; F M Passali; C Viti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Comparison of Anterolateral Thigh and Radial Forearm Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Authors:  Carlo M Oranges; Barbara Ling; Mathias Tremp; Reto Wettstein; Daniel F Kalbermatten; Dirk J Schaefer
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Assessment of Functional Recovery and Subjective Donor-Site Morbidity Following Radial Forearm Flap Reconstruction in Small- to Moderate-Sized Palatal Defects.

Authors:  Ashok B Chandrappa; Ritu S Batth; Srikanth Vasudevan; Anantheswar N R Yellambalase; Pradeep N Kumar; Sudarshan Reddy; J Nidya Seles
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-16

10.  Reduction of donor site morbidity of free radial forearm flaps: what level of evidence is available?

Authors:  Denys J Loeffelbein; Sammy Al-Benna; Lars Steinsträßer; Robin M Satanovskij; Nils H Rohleder; Thomas Mücke; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Marco R Kesting
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.