Literature DB >> 15577304

Should full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs replace the scanogram for measurement of limb length discrepancy?

M Shaun Machen1, Peter M Stevens.   

Abstract

The orthoroentgenogram, commonly known as the 'scanogram', continues to be the most widely used imaging technique for measuring limb length discrepancy (LLD). This study reviews other methods of measuring LLD including full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs, computed tomography/digital localization image, and microdose digital scanography. We present seven cases that demonstrate the pitfalls of scanograms as compared with full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs. Illustrative cases provide the rationale for the clinician managing LLD on a regular basis to utilize full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs as the instrument that will provide the most clinically relevant information.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15577304     DOI: 10.1097/01202412-200501000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  10 in total

1.  Heuristic exploration of how leg checking procedures may lead to inappropriate sacroiliac clinical interventions.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-09

2.  Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Geert Meermans; Ahmad Malik; Johan Witt; Fares Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Methods for assessing leg length discrepancy.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sabharwal; Ajay Kumar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Guided growth for ankle valgus.

Authors:  Peter M Stevens; Jason M Kennedy; Man Hung
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Growth Deceleration for Limb Length Discrepancy: Tension Band Plates Followed to Maturity.

Authors:  Peter Stevens; Matias Desperes; Philip K McClure; Angela Presson; Jennifer Herrick
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2022 Jan-Apr

6.  The Comparison of Lower Extremity Length and Angle between Computed Radiography-Based Teleoroentgenogram and EOS® Imaging System.

Authors:  Kwang-Rak Park; Jae-Ho Lee; Dae-Soo Kim; Ho Ryu; Jaeho Kim; Chang-Jin Yon; Si-Wook Lee
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22

7.  A technique for calculating limb length inequality and epiphyseodesis timing using the multiplier method and a spreadsheet.

Authors:  James O Sanders; Joseph G Khoury; Shyam Kishan
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Accuracy of biplanar linear radiography versus conventional radiographs when used for lower limb and implant measurements.

Authors:  Chen Xi Kasia Chua; Si Heng Sharon Tan; Andrew Kean Seng Lim; James Hoipo Hui
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  The role of guided growth as it relates to limb lengthening.

Authors:  Peter M Stevens
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Corrective tibial osteotomy in young adults using an intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Kang-Il Kim; Peter H Thaller; Alankar Ramteke; Sang Hak Lee; Seung-Hyuk Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2014-05-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.