Literature DB >> 15576240

Etoposide exposure during male mouse pachytene has complex effects on crossing-over and causes nondisjunction.

Liane B Russell1, Patricia R Hunsicker, Marilyn Kerley, April Pyle, Arnold M Saxton.   

Abstract

In experiments involving different germ-cell stages, we had previously found meiotic prophase of the male mouse to be vulnerable to the induction of several types of genetic damage by the topoisomerase-II inhibitor etoposide. The present study of etoposide effects involved two end points of meiotic events known to occur in primary spermatocytes--chromosomal crossing-over and segregation. By following assortment of 13 microsatellite markers in two chromosomes (Ch 7 and Ch 15) it was shown that etoposide significantly affected crossing-over, but did not do so in a uniform fashion. Treatment generally changed the pattern for each chromosome, leading to local decreases in recombination, a distal shift in locations of crossing-over, and an overall decrease in double crossovers; at least some of these results might be interpreted as evidence for increased interference. Two methods were used to explore etoposide effects on chromosome segregation: a genetic experiment capable of detecting sex-chromosome nondisjunction in living progeny; and the use of FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) technology to score numbers of Chromosomes X, Y, and 8 in spermatozoa. Taken together these two approaches indicated that etoposide exposure of pachytene spermatocytes induces malsegregation, and that the findings of the genetic experiment probably yielded a marked underestimate of nondisjunction. As indicated by certain segregants, at least part of the etoposide effect could be due to disrupted pairing of achiasmatic homologs, followed by precocious sister-centromere separation. It has been shown for several organisms that absent or reduced levels of recombination, as well as suboptimally positioned recombination events, may be associated with abnormal segregation. Etoposide is the only chemical tested to date for which living progeny indicates an effect on both male meiotic crossing-over and chromosome segregation. Whether, however, etoposide-induced changes in recombination patterns are direct causes of the observed malsegregation requires additional investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15576240     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  7 in total

1.  Cohesin removal precedes topoisomerase IIα-dependent decatenation at centromeres in male mammalian meiosis II.

Authors:  Rocío Gómez; Alberto Viera; Inés Berenguer; Elena Llano; Alberto M Pendás; José Luis Barbero; Akihiko Kikuchi; José A Suja
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  In vitro micronucleus assay scored by flow cytometry provides a comprehensive evaluation of cytogenetic damage and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Jeffrey C Bemis; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Negative supercoils regulate meiotic crossover patterns in budding yeast.

Authors:  Taicong Tan; Yingjin Tan; Ying Wang; Xiao Yang; Binyuan Zhai; Shuxian Zhang; Xuan Yang; Hui Nie; Jinmin Gao; Jun Zhou; Liangran Zhang; Shunxin Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 19.160

4.  TOPII and chromosome movement help remove interlocks between entangled chromosomes during meiosis.

Authors:  Marina Martinez-Garcia; Veit Schubert; Kim Osman; Alice Darbyshire; Eugenio Sanchez-Moran; F Chris H Franklin
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 10.539

5.  The Role of Topoisomerase II in DNA Repair and Recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Marina Martinez-Garcia; Charles I White; F Chris H Franklin; Eugenio Sanchez-Moran
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  GCNA Interacts with Spartan and Topoisomerase II to Regulate Genome Stability.

Authors:  Gregoriy A Dokshin; Gregory M Davis; Ashley D Sawle; Matthew D Eldridge; Peter K Nicholls; Taylin E Gourley; Katherine A Romer; Luke W Molesworth; Hannah R Tatnell; Ahmet R Ozturk; Dirk G de Rooij; Gregory J Hannon; David C Page; Craig C Mello; Michelle A Carmell
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Aneugenic effects of epirubicin in somatic and germinal cells of male mice.

Authors:  Sabry Mohamed Attia; Sheikh Fayaz Ahmad; Radwa Mohamed Okash; Saleh Abdulrahman Bakheet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.