Literature DB >> 1557569

Bayesian subset analysis in a colorectal cancer clinical trial.

D O Dixon1, R Simon.   

Abstract

Subset analysis is the examination of treatment comparisons within groups of patients with restricted levels of patient characteristics. Such analyses are vulnerable to multiplicity effects. We examine the problem in the context of a proportional hazards model with terms for treatment, each of several dichotomous covariates representing the patient characteristics of interest, and treatment-by-covariate interaction effects. Parametrically, a subset-specific treatment effect is equal to the treatment effect term plus a linear combination of the interaction terms. We present Bayesian point and interval estimates under the assumption that the interaction terms are exchangeable and the prior distributions for the other regression parameters are locally uniform. This produces a shrinking of the estimated interaction effects towards zero, thereby discounting them and dealing in a natural way with multiplicity. We illustrate the method using results of a recent North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic study in advanced colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1557569     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780110104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

Review 1.  Methods in health service research. An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment.

Authors:  D J Spiegelhalter; J P Myles; D R Jones; K R Abrams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-21

2.  Interpreting trial results in light of conflicting evidence: a Bayesian analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Miksad; Mithat Gönen; Thomas J Lynch; Thomas G Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Bayesian statistical methods.

Authors:  L Freedman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-07

4.  Costs and effectiveness of the fast track intervention for antisocial behavior.

Authors:  E Michael Foster
Journal:  J Ment Health Policy Econ       Date:  2010-09

5.  Bayesian clinical trials at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: An update.

Authors:  Rebecca S Slack Tidwell; S Andrew Peng; Minxing Chen; Diane D Liu; Ying Yuan; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Adaptive Enrichment Designs in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Peter F Thall
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 7.917

Review 7.  Statistical aspects of prognostic factor studies in oncology.

Authors:  R Simon; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Methods for identification and confirmation of targeted subgroups in clinical trials: A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Ondra; Alex Dmitrienko; Tim Friede; Alexandra Graf; Frank Miller; Nigel Stallard; Martin Posch
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 9.  Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A E Ades; Mark Sculpher; Alex Sutton; Keith Abrams; Nicola Cooper; Nicky Welton; Guobing Lu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.