Literature DB >> 15574759

Prognostic relevance of gene amplifications and coamplifications in breast cancer.

Khawla Al-Kuraya1, Peter Schraml, Joachim Torhorst, Coya Tapia, Boriana Zaharieva, Hedvika Novotny, Hanspeter Spichtin, Robert Maurer, Martina Mirlacher, Ossi Köchli, Markus Zuber, Holger Dieterich, Friedrich Mross, Kim Wilber, Ronald Simon, Guido Sauter.   

Abstract

Multiple different oncogenes have been described previously to be amplified in breast cancer including HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2. Gene amplification results in oncogene overexpression but may also serve as an indicator of genomic instability. As such, presence of one or several gene amplifications may have prognostic significance. To assess the prognostic importance of amplifications and coamplifications of HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2 in breast cancer, we analyzed a breast cancer tissue microarray containing samples from 2197 cancers with follow-up information. Fluorescence in situ hybridizations revealed amplifications of CCND1 in 20.1%, HER2 in 17.3%, MDM2 in 5.7%, MYC in 5.3%, and EGFR in 0.8% of the tumors. All gene amplifications were significantly associated with high grade. HER2 (P < 0.001) and MYC amplification (P < 0.001) were also linked to shortened survival. In case of HER2, this was independent of grade, pT, and pN categories. MYC amplification was almost 3 times more frequent in medullary cancer (15.9%), than in the histologic subtype with the second highest frequency (ductal; 5.6%; P = 0.0046). HER2 and MYC amplification were associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity (P < 0.001) whereas CCND1 amplification was linked to estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positivity (P < 0.001). Coamplifications were more prevalent than expected based on the individual frequencies. Coamplifications of one or several other oncogenes occurred in 29.6% of CCND1, 43% of HER2, 55.7% of MDM2, 65% of MYC, and 72.8% of EGFR-amplified cancers. HER2/MYC-coamplified cancers had a worse prognosis than tumors with only one of these amplifications. Furthermore, a gradual decrease of survival was observed with increasing number of amplifications. In conclusion, these data support a major prognostic impact of genomic instability as determined by a broad gene amplification survey in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15574759     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  108 in total

1.  Deregulating MYC in a model of HER2+ breast cancer mimics human intertumoral heterogeneity.

Authors:  Tyler Risom; Xiaoyan Wang; Juan Liang; Xiaoli Zhang; Carl Pelz; Lydia G Campbell; Jenny Eng; Koei Chin; Caroline Farrington; Goutham Narla; Ellen M Langer; Xiao-Xin Sun; Yulong Su; Colin J Daniel; Mu-Shui Dai; Christiane V Löhr; Rosalie C Sears
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Attenuation of Forkhead signaling by the retinal determination factor DACH1.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; Chenguang Wang; Zhibin Wang; Will Dampier; Kongming Wu; Mathew C Casimiro; Iouri Chepelev; Vladimir M Popov; Andrew Quong; Aydin Tozeren; Keji Zhao; Michael P Lisanti; Richard G Pestell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd W Miller; Justin M Balko; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Neuregulin autocrine signaling promotes self-renewal of breast tumor-initiating cells by triggering HER2/HER3 activation.

Authors:  Cleo Yi-Fang Lee; Yuan Lin; Scott V Bratman; Weiguo Feng; Angera H Kuo; Ferenc A Scheeren; Jesse M Engreitz; Sushama Varma; Robert B West; Maximilian Diehn
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  N0436 (Alliance): A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan With Cetuximab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Exposed to Anthracycline and/or Taxane-Containing Therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer A Crozier; Pooja P Advani; Betsy LaPlant; Timothy Hobday; Anthony J Jaslowski; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Edith A Perez
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  QM-FISH analysis of the genes involved in the G1/S checkpoint signaling pathway in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Yingbo Shao; Guofang Hou; Jingchao Bai; Weiping Yuan; Linping Hu; Tao Cheng; Anders Zetterberg; Jin Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-10-05

7.  Chromosomal changes in aggressive breast cancers with basal-like features.

Authors:  Wayne Yu; Yasmine Kanaan; Young Kyung Bae; Young-Kyung Baed; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2009-08

8.  Comprehensive characterization of the DNA amplification at 13q34 in human breast cancer reveals TFDP1 and CUL4A as likely candidate target genes.

Authors:  Lorenzo Melchor; Laura Paula Saucedo-Cuevas; Iván Muñoz-Repeto; Socorro María Rodríguez-Pinilla; Emiliano Honrado; Alfredo Campoverde; Jose Palacios; Katherine L Nathanson; María José García; Javier Benítez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  c-Myc affects mRNA translation, cell proliferation and progenitor cell function in the mammary gland.

Authors:  Tina Stoelzle; Patrick Schwarb; Andreas Trumpp; Nancy E Hynes
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Gene expression meta-analysis identifies metastatic pathways and transcription factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Mads Thomassen; Qihua Tan; Torben A Kruse
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.