Literature DB >> 1557452

Assessing the effects of odorants on nasal airway size and breathing.

D W Warren1, J C Walker, A F Drake, R W Lutz.   

Abstract

A technique was developed to obtain continuous measurements of both respiratory behavior and nasal patency in response to well-controlled odorant stimulation. An automated apparatus similar to that described by Walker et al. (27) was used to present precise concentrations of an odorant. The pressure-flow technique (28) was used to continuously measure nasal airway cross-sectional area, nasal airflow rate, air volume and time characteristics associated with breathing before and during odorant stimulation. Immediately following each odorant presentation, subjects entered their psychophysical responses into a microcomputer via an electronic mouse. Respiratory and psychophysical responses of ten normal subjects to four concentrations of acetic acid during eight odorant trials were recorded; eight clean-air trials were also conducted. At the highest concentration, changes in respiratory behavior were observed as early as 200 ms after stimulus onset in some subjects. Inspiratory volumes during odorant presentation were lower than those seen just before stimulation. The magnitude of this decrease was directly related to the concentration of acetic acid and to the perceived intensity of the odor and degree of nasal irritation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1557452     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90161-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  3 in total

1.  What is normal nasal airflow? A computational study of 22 healthy adults.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 2.  Human breathing and eye blink rate responses to airborne chemicals.

Authors:  J C Walker; M Kendal-Reed; M J Utell; W S Cain
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Concentrated swine feeding operations and public health: a review of occupational and community health effects.

Authors:  D Cole; L Todd; S Wing
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.