OBJECTIVES: Surgical resection is still a mainstay of the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). However, recurrence is the rule. The aim of the present study was to evaluate CD recurrence in a series of patients who underwent surgical resection with subsequent treatment with azathioprine (AZA) or mesalazine (5-ASA) and to identify the factors associated with recurrence. METHODS: The medical records of patients with CD who underwent bowel resection during a 4-year period were reviewed. Only patients who received AZA or 5-ASA as prophylaxis for recurrence were included. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients treated with AZA and 16 treated with 5-ASA were included. Endoscopic recurrence was found in 8.6% of the AZA group and in 87.5% of the 5-ASA group (p <0.001). Clinical recurrence occurred in 31.2% of patients in the 5-ASA group and in none in the AZA group (p=0.004). The accumulated probability of both clinical and endoscopic recurrence was significantly lower in the AZA group (p=0.0025 and p=0.005, respectively). Factors associated with a greater risk of endoscopic recurrence were termino-terminal anastomosis and 5-ASA treatment. The only factor associated with clinical recurrence was 5-ASA treatment. CONCLUSION: AZA seems to be more effective than 5-ASA in the prevention of postsurgical endoscopic recurrence of CD. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to establish the true utility of AZA in the prophylaxis of CD recurrence.
OBJECTIVES: Surgical resection is still a mainstay of the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). However, recurrence is the rule. The aim of the present study was to evaluate CD recurrence in a series of patients who underwent surgical resection with subsequent treatment with azathioprine (AZA) or mesalazine (5-ASA) and to identify the factors associated with recurrence. METHODS: The medical records of patients with CD who underwent bowel resection during a 4-year period were reviewed. Only patients who received AZA or 5-ASA as prophylaxis for recurrence were included. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients treated with AZA and 16 treated with 5-ASA were included. Endoscopic recurrence was found in 8.6% of the AZA group and in 87.5% of the 5-ASA group (p <0.001). Clinical recurrence occurred in 31.2% of patients in the 5-ASA group and in none in the AZA group (p=0.004). The accumulated probability of both clinical and endoscopic recurrence was significantly lower in the AZA group (p=0.0025 and p=0.005, respectively). Factors associated with a greater risk of endoscopic recurrence were termino-terminal anastomosis and 5-ASA treatment. The only factor associated with clinical recurrence was 5-ASA treatment. CONCLUSION:AZA seems to be more effective than 5-ASA in the prevention of postsurgical endoscopic recurrence of CD. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to establish the true utility of AZA in the prophylaxis of CD recurrence.