Literature DB >> 15574154

Sacral nerve stimulation: an emerging treatment for faecal incontinence.

Joe J Tjandra1, Jit Fong Lim, Klaus Matzel.   

Abstract

Faecal incontinence is common, distressing to the patient and socially incapacitating. The treatment options depend on the severity and aetiology of incontinence. For mild cases of faecal incontinence, medical management and pelvic floor physiotherapy may be adequate. For more severe cases, surgery is often required. Patients who have a distinct sphincter defect are amenable to surgical repair. In many cases, there is a combination of diffuse structural damage of the anal sphincters with pudendal neuropathy. Conventional surgical repairs have a modest degree of success and the results tend to deteriorate with time. Neosphincter procedures such as artificial bowel sphincter and dynamic graciloplasty are potentially morbid and technically complex. Sacral nerve stimulation is innovative and has had a medium-term success with improvement of quality of life in over 80% of patients treated for faecal incontinence. These results are superior to other techniques in treating patients with severe refractory faecal incontinence, where current maximal therapy has failed. The technique is unique because there is a screening phase, which has a high predictive value. It is also associated with minimal complications that are usually minor. However, most published reports of sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of faecal incontinence were case studies and methods of assessing outcome were variable. Criteria for patient selection are evolving and are yet to be defined. The present paper critically reviews the publications to date on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of faecal incontinence. This will form the basis for future evaluation of this emerging treatment of severe, intractable faecal incontinence. Randomized clinical trials like that of the Melbourne trial will further clarify the role and indications of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15574154     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03259.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  17 in total

1.  Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Emile Tan; Nye-Thane Ngo; Ara Darzi; Michael Shenouda; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The probability of finding nerve branches to the external anal sphincter.

Authors:  Leszek Stefanski; Paweł Lampe; Ryszard Aleksandrowicz
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: an effective surgical intervention.

Authors:  Giuseppe Chiarioni; Olafur S Palsson; Corrado R Asteria; William E Whitehead
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  [Treatment of sphincter insufficiency].

Authors:  K E Matzel; B Bittorf
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Neurostimulation of the lacrimal nerve for enhanced tear production.

Authors:  Andrea L Kossler; Jianhua Wang; William Feuer; David T Tse
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.746

6.  Chiropractic management of a 5-year-old boy with urinary and bowel incontinence.

Authors:  Keith R Kamrath
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-03

7.  Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS).

Authors:  Alexander Hotouras; Jamie Murphy; Marion Allison; Anne Curry; Norman S Williams; Charles H Knowles; Christopher L Chan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Neurovascular antropylorus perineal transposition using inferior rectal nerve anastomosis for total anorectal reconstruction: preliminary report in humans.

Authors:  A Chandra; A Kumar; M Noushif; V Gupta; V Kumar; P K Srivastav; H S Malhotra; M Kumar; U C Ghoshal
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Feasibility of neurovascular antropylorus perineal transposition with pudendal nerve anastomosis following anorectal excision: a cadaveric study for neoanal reconstruction.

Authors:  Abhijit Chandra; Ashok Kumar; M Noushif; Nitish Gupta; Vijay Kumar; Navneet Kumar Chauhan; Vishal Gupta
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  [Diagnosis and therapy of stool incontinence].

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.