Literature DB >> 15573572

Effects on the function of Arctic ecosystems in the short- and long-term perspectives.

Terry V Callaghan1, Lars Olof Björn, Yuri Chernov, Terry Chapin, Torben R Christensen, Brian Huntley, Rolf A Ims, Margareta Johansson, Dyanna Jolly, Sven Jonasson, Nadya Matveyeva, Nicolai Panikov, Walter Oechel, Gus Shaver.   

Abstract

Historically, the function of Arctic ecosystems in terms of cycles of nutrients and carbon has led to low levels of primary production and exchanges of energy, water and greenhouse gases have led to low local and regional cooling. Sequestration of carbon from atmospheric CO2, in extensive, cold organic soils and the high albedo from low, snow-covered vegetation have had impacts on regional climate. However, many aspects of the functioning of Arctic ecosystems are sensitive to changes in climate and its impacts on biodiversity. The current Arctic climate results in slow rates of organic matter decomposition. Arctic ecosystems therefore tend to accumulate organic matter and elements despite low inputs. As a result, soil-available elements like nitrogen and phosphorus are key limitations to increases in carbon fixation and further biomass and organic matter accumulation. Climate warming is expected to increase carbon and element turnover, particularly in soils, which may lead to initial losses of elements but eventual, slow recovery. Individual species and species diversity have clear impacts on element inputs and retention in Arctic ecosystems. Effects of increased CO2 and UV-B on whole ecosystems, on the other hand, are likely to be small although effects on plant tissue chemisty, decomposition and nitrogen fixation may become important in the long-term. Cycling of carbon in trace gas form is mainly as CO2 and CH4. Most carbon loss is in the form of CO2, produced by both plants and soil biota. Carbon emissions as methane from wet and moist tundra ecosystems are about 5% of emissions as CO2 and are responsive to warming in the absence of any other changes. Winter processes and vegetation type also affect CH4 emissions as well as exchanges of energy between biosphere and atmosphere. Arctic ecosystems exhibit the largest seasonal changes in energy exchange of any terrestrial ecosystem because of the large changes in albedo from late winter, when snow reflects most incoming radiation, to summer when the ecosystem absorbs most incoming radiation. Vegetation profoundly influences the water and energy exchange of Arctic ecosystems. Albedo during the period of snow cover declines from tundra to forest tundra to deciduous forest to evergreen forest. Shrubs and trees increase snow depth which in turn increases winter soil temperatures. Future changes in vegetation driven by climate change are therefore, very likely to profoundly alter regional climate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15573572     DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-33.7.448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  4 in total

Review 1.  Status and trends in Arctic vegetation: Evidence from experimental warming and long-term monitoring.

Authors:  Anne D Bjorkman; Mariana García Criado; Isla H Myers-Smith; Virve Ravolainen; Ingibjörg Svala Jónsdóttir; Kristine Bakke Westergaard; James P Lawler; Mora Aronsson; Bruce Bennett; Hans Gardfjell; Starri Heiðmarsson; Laerke Stewart; Signe Normand
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome.

Authors:  Anne D Bjorkman; Isla H Myers-Smith; Sarah C Elmendorf; Signe Normand; Nadja Rüger; Pieter S A Beck; Anne Blach-Overgaard; Daan Blok; J Hans C Cornelissen; Bruce C Forbes; Damien Georges; Scott J Goetz; Kevin C Guay; Gregory H R Henry; Janneke HilleRisLambers; Robert D Hollister; Dirk N Karger; Jens Kattge; Peter Manning; Janet S Prevéy; Christian Rixen; Gabriela Schaepman-Strub; Haydn J D Thomas; Mark Vellend; Martin Wilmking; Sonja Wipf; Michele Carbognani; Luise Hermanutz; Esther Lévesque; Ulf Molau; Alessandro Petraglia; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia; Marko J Spasojevic; Marcello Tomaselli; Tage Vowles; Juha M Alatalo; Heather D Alexander; Alba Anadon-Rosell; Sandra Angers-Blondin; Mariska Te Beest; Logan Berner; Robert G Björk; Agata Buchwal; Allan Buras; Katherine Christie; Elisabeth J Cooper; Stefan Dullinger; Bo Elberling; Anu Eskelinen; Esther R Frei; Oriol Grau; Paul Grogan; Martin Hallinger; Karen A Harper; Monique M P D Heijmans; James Hudson; Karl Hülber; Maitane Iturrate-Garcia; Colleen M Iversen; Francesca Jaroszynska; Jill F Johnstone; Rasmus Halfdan Jørgensen; Elina Kaarlejärvi; Rebecca Klady; Sara Kuleza; Aino Kulonen; Laurent J Lamarque; Trevor Lantz; Chelsea J Little; James D M Speed; Anders Michelsen; Ann Milbau; Jacob Nabe-Nielsen; Sigrid Schøler Nielsen; Josep M Ninot; Steven F Oberbauer; Johan Olofsson; Vladimir G Onipchenko; Sabine B Rumpf; Philipp Semenchuk; Rohan Shetti; Laura Siegwart Collier; Lorna E Street; Katharine N Suding; Ken D Tape; Andrew Trant; Urs A Treier; Jean-Pierre Tremblay; Maxime Tremblay; Susanna Venn; Stef Weijers; Tara Zamin; Noémie Boulanger-Lapointe; William A Gould; David S Hik; Annika Hofgaard; Ingibjörg S Jónsdóttir; Janet Jorgenson; Julia Klein; Borgthor Magnusson; Craig Tweedie; Philip A Wookey; Michael Bahn; Benjamin Blonder; Peter M van Bodegom; Benjamin Bond-Lamberty; Giandiego Campetella; Bruno E L Cerabolini; F Stuart Chapin; William K Cornwell; Joseph Craine; Matteo Dainese; Franciska T de Vries; Sandra Díaz; Brian J Enquist; Walton Green; Ruben Milla; Ülo Niinemets; Yusuke Onoda; Jenny C Ordoñez; Wim A Ozinga; Josep Penuelas; Hendrik Poorter; Peter Poschlod; Peter B Reich; Brody Sandel; Brandon Schamp; Serge Sheremetev; Evan Weiher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Two decades of experimental manipulations of heaths and forest understory in the subarctic.

Authors:  Anders Michelsen; Riikka Rinnan; Sven Jonasson
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Twenty-two years of warming, fertilisation and shading of subarctic heath shrubs promote secondary growth and plasticity but not primary growth.

Authors:  Matteo Campioli; Niki Leblans; Anders Michelsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.