Literature DB >> 15573570

Responses to projected changes in climate and UV-B at the species level.

Terry V Callaghan1, Lars Olof Björn, Yuri Chernov, Terry Chapin, Torben R Christensen, Brian Huntley, Rolf A Ims, Margareta Johansson, Dyanna Jolly, Sven Jonasson, Nadya Matveyeva, Nicolai Panikov, Walter Oechel, Gus Shaver, Josef Elster, Ingibjörg S Jónsdóttir, Kari Laine, Kari Taulavuori, Erja Taulavuori, Christoph Zöckler.   

Abstract

Environmental manipulation experiments showed that species respond individualistically to each environmental-change variable. The greatest responses of plants were generally to nutrient, particularly nitrogen, addition. Summer warming experiments showed that woody plant responses were dominant and that mosses and lichens became less abundant. Responses to warming were controlled by moisture availability and snow cover. Many invertebrates increased population growth in response to summer warming, as long as desiccation was not induced. CO2 and UV-B enrichment experiments showed that plant and animal responses were small. However, some microorganisms and species of fungi were sensitive to increased UV-B and some intensive mutagenic actions could, perhaps, lead to unexpected epidemic outbreaks. Tundra soil heating, CO2 enrichment and amendment with mineral nutrients generally accelerated microbial activity. Algae are likely to dominate cyanobacteria in milder climates. Expected increases in winter freeze-thaw cycles leading to ice-crust formation are likely to severely reduce winter survival rate and disrupt the population dynamics of many terrestrial animals. A deeper snow cover is likely to restrict access to winter pastures by reindeer/caribou and their ability to flee from predators while any earlier onset of the snow-free period is likely to stimulate increased plant growth. Initial species responses to climate change might occur at the sub-species level: an Arctic plant or animal species with high genetic/racial diversity has proved an ability to adapt to different environmental conditions in the past and is likely to do so also in the future. Indigenous knowledge, air photographs, satellite images and monitoring show that changes in the distributions of some species are already occurring: Arctic vegetation is becoming more shrubby and more productive, there have been recent changes in the ranges of caribou, and "new" species of insects and birds previously associated with areas south of the treeline have been recorded. In contrast, almost all Arctic breeding bird species are declining and models predict further quite dramatic reductions of the populations of tundra birds due to warming. Species-climate response surface models predict potential future ranges of current Arctic species that are often markedly reduced and displaced northwards in response to warming. In contrast, invertebrates and microorganisms are very likely to quickly expand their ranges northwards into the Arctic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15573570     DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-33.7.418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  8 in total

1.  Adapting to the impacts of climate change on food security among Inuit in the Western Canadian Arctic.

Authors:  Sonia D Wesche; Hing Man Chan
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  Global change tipping points: above- and below-ground biotic interactions in a low diversity ecosystem.

Authors:  Diana H Wall
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Ecosystem response to climatic change: the importance of the cold season.

Authors:  Stef Bokhorst; Jarle W Bjerke; Hans Tømmervik; Catherine Preece; Gareth K Phoenix
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Impacts of long-term enhanced UV-B radiation on bryophytes in two sub-Arctic heathland sites of contrasting water availability.

Authors:  M Arróniz-Crespo; D Gwynn-Jones; T V Callaghan; E Núñez-Olivera; J Martínez-Abaigar; P Horton; G K Phoenix
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Comparative cryptogam ecology: a review of bryophyte and lichen traits that drive biogeochemistry.

Authors:  Johannes H C Cornelissen; Simone I Lang; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia; Heinjo J During
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Impacts of diurnal variation of ultraviolet-B and photosynthetically active radiation on phycobiliproteins of the hot-spring cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. strain HKAR-2.

Authors:  Vinod K Kannaujiya; Rajeshwar P Sinha
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.356

7.  Responses of a hot spring cyanobacterium under ultraviolet and photosynthetically active radiation: photosynthetic performance, antioxidative enzymes, mycosporine-like amino acid profiling and its antioxidative potentials.

Authors:  Haseen Ahmed; Jainendra Pathak; Piyush K Sonkar; Vellaichamy Ganesan; Donat-P Häder; Rajeshwar P Sinha
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Twenty-two years of warming, fertilisation and shading of subarctic heath shrubs promote secondary growth and plasticity but not primary growth.

Authors:  Matteo Campioli; Niki Leblans; Anders Michelsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.