Literature DB >> 15573416

Average peptide score: a useful parameter for identification of proteins derived from database searches of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry data.

Cindy Lou Chepanoske1, Bonnie E Richardson, Moritz von Rechenberg, John M Peltier.   

Abstract

The quantity and variable quality of data that can be generated from liquid chromatography (LC)/mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics analyses creates many challenges in interpreting the spectra in terms of the actual proteins in a complex sample. In spite of improvements in algorithms that match putative peptide sequences to MS/MS spectra, the assembly of these lists of possible or probable peptides into a 'correct' set of proteins is still problematic. We have observed a trend in a simple relationship, derived from standard database search outputs, which can be useful in assessing the quality of a MS/MS-based protein identification. Specifically, the ratio of the protein score and number of non-redundant peptides, or average peptide score (APS), can facilitate initial filtering of database search results in addition to providing a useful measure of confidence for the proteins identified. This parameter has been applied to results from the analysis of multi-protein complexes derived from pull-down experiments analyzed using a two-dimensional LC/MS/MS workflow. In particular, the complex list of protein identifications derived from a drug affinity pull-down with immobilized ampicillin and an E. coli lysate was greatly simplified by applying the APS as a filter, allowing for facile identification of the penicillin-binding proteins known to interact with ampicillin. Furthermore, an APS threshold can be used for any data sets derived from electrospray ionization (ESI)- or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MS/MS experiments and is also not specific to any database search program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15573416     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  6 in total

1.  Merging molecular electron microscopy and mass spectrometry by carbon film-assisted endoproteinase digestion.

Authors:  Florian M Richter; Bjoern Sander; Monika M Golas; Holger Stark; Henning Urlaub
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 2.  Metaproteomics of the human gut microbiota: Challenges and contributions to other OMICS.

Authors:  Ngom Issa Isaac; Decloquement Philippe; Armstrong Nicholas; Didier Raoult; Chabrière Eric
Journal:  Clin Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-06-04

3.  Determining the protein repertoire of Cryptosporidium parvum sporozoites.

Authors:  Sanya J Sanderson; Dong Xia; Helena Prieto; John Yates; Mark Heiges; Jessica C Kissinger; Elizabeth Bromley; Kalpana Lal; Robert E Sinden; Fiona Tomley; Jonathan M Wastling
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines.

Authors:  Andrew R Jones; Jennifer A Siepen; Simon J Hubbard; Norman W Paton
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Differential proteomic analysis of human erythroblasts undergoing apoptosis induced by epo-withdrawal.

Authors:  Stéphanie Pellegrin; Kate J Heesom; Timothy J Satchwell; Bethan R Hawley; Geoff Daniels; Emile van den Akker; Ashley M Toye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Proteomics analysis of the nucleolus in adenovirus-infected cells.

Authors:  Yun W Lam; Vanessa C Evans; Kate J Heesom; Angus I Lamond; David A Matthews
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.911

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.