PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify contributing factors to skeletal relapse by analyzing cephalometric changes after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 60 consecutive patients who underwent either mandibular advancement (30 patients) or setback surgery (30 patients). There were 36 women and 24 men (mean age, 23 years). The radiographs of these patients taken immediately before operation, at 1 week, and 14 months postoperatively were studied. To analyze the influence of hyper- and hypodivergent facial patterns on the surgical outcome, the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the mandibulo-nasal plane angle. The position of the maxilla was also taken into account. RESULTS: Measured at B-point, skeletal relapse was 1.3 mm (30%) after mean advancement of 4.4 mm and 0.8 mm (12%) after setback of 6.0 mm. The magnitude of the surgical movement correlated with skeletal relapse. However, the correlation was not linear. Advancement of greater than 7 mm is associated with an increased tendency to relapse (r=0.52), but setback of more than 12 mm with a decreased tendency (r=-0.95). The retrognathic patients with a high mandibulo-nasal plane angle (hyperdivergence) had 30% higher relapse rate. Patients with hypodivergent facial patterns had less relapse in both advancement and setback surgery. CONCLUSION: Skeletal relapse was affected by magnitude of surgical movement and different facial patterns according to the mandibulo-nasal plane angle; however, influences of both factors were different between mandibular advancement and setback.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify contributing factors to skeletal relapse by analyzing cephalometric changes after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 60 consecutive patients who underwent either mandibular advancement (30 patients) or setback surgery (30 patients). There were 36 women and 24 men (mean age, 23 years). The radiographs of these patients taken immediately before operation, at 1 week, and 14 months postoperatively were studied. To analyze the influence of hyper- and hypodivergent facial patterns on the surgical outcome, the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the mandibulo-nasal plane angle. The position of the maxilla was also taken into account. RESULTS: Measured at B-point, skeletal relapse was 1.3 mm (30%) after mean advancement of 4.4 mm and 0.8 mm (12%) after setback of 6.0 mm. The magnitude of the surgical movement correlated with skeletal relapse. However, the correlation was not linear. Advancement of greater than 7 mm is associated with an increased tendency to relapse (r=0.52), but setback of more than 12 mm with a decreased tendency (r=-0.95). The retrognathic patients with a high mandibulo-nasal plane angle (hyperdivergence) had 30% higher relapse rate. Patients with hypodivergent facial patterns had less relapse in both advancement and setback surgery. CONCLUSION: Skeletal relapse was affected by magnitude of surgical movement and different facial patterns according to the mandibulo-nasal plane angle; however, influences of both factors were different between mandibular advancement and setback.