Literature DB >> 15573263

Patterns and clinical outcomes associated with routine intravenous sodium and fluid administration after colorectal resection.

Andrew L Tambyraja1, Fergus Sengupta, Alasdair B MacGregor, David C C Bartolo, Kenneth C H Fearon.   

Abstract

Excess intravenous water and sodium may be associated with postoperative complications and an adverse outcome. However, the effect of the magnitude of the surgery on such a relation has not been studied. This study assesses current practice in intravenous fluid and sodium administration after colonic and rectal resection and its relation to the postoperative outcome. A series of 100 consecutive patients undergoing elective colonic (n = 44) or rectal resection (n = 56) were included in a retrospective case-cohort study. The volumes of water and sodium from intravenous fluid and antibiotic administration on the day of surgery and the next 5 days were recorded together with the clinical outcome. The mean +/- SEM fluid and sodium administration on the day of operation was greater after rectal than colonic resection (4.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.2 liters and 507 +/- 34 vs. 389 +/- 22 mmol, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean +/- SEM rate of daily fluid and sodium administration for the 5 subsequent days was greater following rectal than colonic resection (2.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.1 L/day and 155 +/- 8.7 vs. 128 +/- 8.0 mmol/day; p < 0.05). For all resections, there were no differences in fluid and sodium administration on the day of surgery in patients with or without postoperative complications. During the subsequent 5 days, patients with complications after colonic resection had a higher postoperative mean rate of intravenous sodium administration than those who did not (149 +/- 12 vs. 115 +/- 10 mmol; p < 0.05). A similar pattern was not observed following rectal resection. Current postoperative intravenous fluid prescription delivers approximately 2 liters of fluid and 140 mmol of sodium per day. Complications after colonic, but not rectal, resection are associated with more early postoperative daily intravenous sodium administration. Because colonic resection poses less of a physiologic insult than rectal resection, the overall outcome in the former group may be more sensitive to the interplay between fluid and sodium overload and patient co-morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15573263     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7383-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  12 in total

1.  Problems with solutions: drowning in the brine of an inadequate knowledge base.

Authors:  D N Lobo; M G Dube; K R Neal; J Simpson; B J Rowlands; S P Allison
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 2.  Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess.

Authors:  K Holte; N E Sharrock; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Acute change in extracellular fluids associated with major surgical procedures.

Authors:  T SHIRES; J WILLIAMS; F BROWN
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Excretion of chloride and sodium after surgical operations.

Authors:  A W WILKINSON; B H BILLING
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1949-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  D R Prytherch; M S Whiteley; B Higgins; P C Weaver; W G Prout; S J Powell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Colloids versus crystalloids and tissue oxygen tension in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  K Lang; J Boldt; S Suttner; G Haisch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  The effects of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients.

Authors:  N J Wilkes; R Woolf; M Mutch; S V Mallett; T Peachey; R Stephens; M G Mythen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Dileep N Lobo; Kate A Bostock; Keith R Neal; Alan C Perkins; Brian J Rowlands; Simon P Allison
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Postoperative fluid overload: not a benign problem.

Authors:  J A Lowell; C Schifferdecker; D F Driscoll; P N Benotti; B R Bistrian
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  O Boyd; R M Grounds; E D Bennett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-12-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  16 in total

1.  Substantial variation of both opinions and practice regarding perioperative fluid resuscitation.

Authors:  Peter C Chong; Elisa F Greco; Danielle Stothart; Donna E Maziak; Sudhir Sundaresan; Farid M Shamji; David Neilipovitz; Lauralyn McIntyre; Paul Hébert; Andrew J E Seely
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Perioperative Fluid Restriction in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanfei Shen; Guolong Cai; Shijin Gong; Jing Yan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Enhanced recovery programme in colorectal surgery: does one size fit all?

Authors:  Alison Lyon; Christopher J Payne; Graham J Mackay
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Perioperative fluid restriction in major abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael R Boland; Ayesha Noorani; Kevin Varty; J Calvin Coffey; Riaz Agha; Stewart R Walsh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Expression of membrane progesterone receptors (mPR/PAQR) in ovarian cancer cells: implications for progesterone-induced signaling events.

Authors:  Nathan J Charles; Peter Thomas; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 7.  Crystalloid fluid choice in the critically ill : Current knowledge and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Carmen A Pfortmueller; Barbara Kabon; Joerg C Schefold; Edith Fleischmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Clinical benefits after the implementation of a protocol of restricted perioperative intravenous crystalloid fluids in major abdominal operations.

Authors:  José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Breno N Diniz; Aracelle V do Carmo; Eryka A O Silveira; Raquel M Silva
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Optimising organ perfusion in the high-risk surgical and critical care patient: a narrative review.

Authors:  Thomas Parker; David Brealey; Alex Dyson; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer.

Authors:  Chun Kheng Khoo; Christopher J Vickery; Nicola Forsyth; Nina S Vinall; Ian A Eyre-Brook
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.