J Elford1, G Bolding, M Davis, L Sherr, G Hart. 1. City University, Institute of Health Sciences, St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, 24 Chiswell Street, London EC1Y 4TY, UK. j.elford@city.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in sexual behaviour among London homosexual men between 1998 and 2003 by type and HIV status of partner. METHODS: Homosexual men (n=4264) using London gyms were surveyed annually between 1998 and 2003 (range 498-834 per year). Information was collected on HIV status, unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in the previous 3 months, and type of partner for UAI. High risk sexual behaviour was defined as UAI with a partner of unknown or discordant HIV status. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2003, the percentage of men reporting high risk sexual behaviour with a casual partner increased from 6.7% to 16.1% (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.36 per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 1.46, p <0.001). There was no significant change in the percentage of men reporting high risk sexual behaviour with a main partner alone (7.8%, 5.6%, p=0.7). These patterns were seen for HIV positive, negative and never tested men alike regardless of age. The percentage of HIV positive men reporting UAI with a casual partner who was also HIV positive increased from 6.8% to 10.3% (AOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.58, p <0.05). CONCLUSION: The increase in high risk sexual behaviour among London homosexual men between 1998 and 2003 was seen only with casual and not with main partners. STI/HIV prevention campaigns among London homosexual men should target high risk practices with casual partners since these appear to account entirely for the recent increase in high risk behaviour.
OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in sexual behaviour among London homosexual men between 1998 and 2003 by type and HIV status of partner. METHODS: Homosexual men (n=4264) using London gyms were surveyed annually between 1998 and 2003 (range 498-834 per year). Information was collected on HIV status, unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in the previous 3 months, and type of partner for UAI. High risk sexual behaviour was defined as UAI with a partner of unknown or discordant HIV status. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2003, the percentage of men reporting high risk sexual behaviour with a casual partner increased from 6.7% to 16.1% (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.36 per year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 1.46, p <0.001). There was no significant change in the percentage of men reporting high risk sexual behaviour with a main partner alone (7.8%, 5.6%, p=0.7). These patterns were seen for HIV positive, negative and never tested men alike regardless of age. The percentage of HIV positive men reporting UAI with a casual partner who was also HIV positive increased from 6.8% to 10.3% (AOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.58, p <0.05). CONCLUSION: The increase in high risk sexual behaviour among London homosexual men between 1998 and 2003 was seen only with casual and not with main partners. STI/HIV prevention campaigns among London homosexual men should target high risk practices with casual partners since these appear to account entirely for the recent increase in high risk behaviour.
Authors: A M Johnson; C H Mercer; B Erens; A J Copas; S McManus; K Wellings; K A Fenton; C Korovessis; W Macdowall; K Nanchahal; S Purdon; J Field Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-12-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Susan J Little; Sarah Holte; Jean-Pierre Routy; Eric S Daar; Marty Markowitz; Ann C Collier; Richard A Koup; John W Mellors; Elizabeth Connick; Brian Conway; Michael Kilby; Lei Wang; Jeannette M Whitcomb; Nicholas S Hellmann; Douglas D Richman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sarah Dougan; Jonathan Elford; Timothy R Chadborn; Alison E Brown; Kirsty Roy; Gary Murphy; O Noel Gill Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2006-11-07 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Seth C Kalichman; Lisa Eaton; Denise White; Charsey Cherry; Howard Pope; Demetria Cain; Moira O Kalichman Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2007-08-10
Authors: Mark Richard Stenger; Stefan Baral; Shauna Stahlman; Dan Wohlfeiler; Jerusha E Barton; Thomas Peterman Journal: Sex Health Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.706
Authors: P D Benn; G Rooney; C Carder; M Brown; S R Stevenson; A Copas; A J Robinson; G L Ridgway Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Jonathan Elford; Eamonn McKeown; Rita Doerner; Simon Nelson; Nicola Low; Jane Anderson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: S Dougan; B G Evans; N Macdonald; D J Goldberg; O N Gill; K A Fenton; J Elford Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2007-07-30 Impact factor: 2.451