Literature DB >> 15572285

The mutagenic hazards of aquatic sediments: a review.

Guosheng Chen1, Paul A White.   

Abstract

Sediments are the sink for particle-sorbed contaminants in aquatic systems and can serve as a reservoir of toxic contaminants that continually threaten the health and viability of aquatic biota. This work is a comprehensive review of published studies that investigated the genotoxicity of sediments in rivers, lakes and marine habitats. The Salmonella mutagenicity test is the most frequently used assay and accounts for 41.1% of the available data. The Salmonella data revealed mutagenic potency values for sediment extracts (in revertants per gram dry weight) that spans over seven orders of magnitude from not detectable to highly potent (10(5) rev/g). Analyses of the Salmonella data (n=510) showed significant differences between rural, urban/industrial, and heavily contaminated (e.g., dump) sites assessed using TA98 and TA100 with S9 activation. Additional analyses showed a significant positive correlation between Salmonella mutagenic potency (TA98 and TA100 with S9) and PAH contamination (r2=0.19-0.68). The second and third most commonly used assays for the analysis of sediments and sediment extracts are the SOS Chromotest (9.2%) and the Mutatox assays (7.8%), respectively. These assays are frequently used for rapid initial screening of collected samples. A variety of other in vitro endpoints employing cultured fish and mammalian cells have been used to investigate sediment genotoxic activity. Endpoints investigated include sister chromatid exchange frequency, micronucleus frequency, chromosome aberration frequency, gene mutation at tk and hprt loci, unscheduled DNA synthesis, DNA adduct frequency, and DNA strand break frequency. More complex in vivo assays have documented a wide range of effects including neoplasms and preneoplastic lesions in fish and invertebrate exposed ex situ. Although costly and time consuming, these assays have provided definitive evidence linking sediment contamination and a variety of genotoxic and carcinogenic effects observed in situ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15572285     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  25 in total

1.  The endophytic bacterium Serratia sp. PW7 degrades pyrene in wheat.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhu; Wanqing Wang; David E Crowley; Kai Sun; Shupeng Hao; Michael Gatheru Waigi; Yanzheng Gao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mutagenicity assessment of contaminated soil in the vicinity of industrial area.

Authors:  Reshma Anjum; Abdul Malik
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Identification of genes that confer sediment fitness to Desulfovibrio desulfuricans G20.

Authors:  Qingwei Luo; Jennifer L Groh; Jimmy D Ballard; Lee R Krumholz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effect-directed analysis (EDA) in aquatic ecotoxicology: state of the art and future challenges.

Authors:  Markus Hecker; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Biodiversity for our future.

Authors:  Yukio Yokota; Valeria Matranga
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Acetylcholinesterase in zebrafish embryos as a tool to identify neurotoxic effects in sediments.

Authors:  Britta Kais; Daniel Stengel; Annika Batel; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Evaluation of the impact of bioaccumulation of PAH from the marine environment on DNA integrity and oxidative stress in marine rock oyster (Saccostrea cucullata) along the Arabian sea coast.

Authors:  A Sarkar; Jacky Bhagat; Munmun Saha Sarker; Dipak C S Gaitonde; Subhodeep Sarker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Use of three bivalve species for biomonitoring a polluted estuarine environment.

Authors:  Juan Fernández-Tajes; Fernanda Flórez; Sandra Pereira; Tamara Rábade; Blanca Laffon; Josefina Méndez
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Reproductive and genotoxic effects in zebrafish after chronic exposure to methyl methanesulfonate in a multigeneration study.

Authors:  Christopher Faßbender; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 10.  Solution by dilution?--A review on the pollution status of the Yangtze River.

Authors:  Tilman Floehr; Hongxia Xiao; Björn Scholz-Starke; Lingling Wu; Junli Hou; Daqiang Yin; Xiaowei Zhang; Rong Ji; Xingzhong Yuan; Richard Ottermanns; Martina Roß-Nickoll; Andreas Schäffer; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.