Literature DB >> 15571885

A feasibility study of an intervention to enhance family support for breast feeding in a deprived area in Bristol, UK.

Jenny Ingram1, Debbie Johnson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to assess fathers' and grandmothers' knowledge of breast feeding and their ability to support successful breast feeding. To design a suitable intervention for fathers and grandmothers to support breast-feeding mothers, to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and monitor its likely effects on breast-feeding rates.
DESIGN: qualitative focus groups and interviews. Evaluation of the feasibility of an antenatal intervention.
SETTING: Community Health Centre and family homes in an area of relative social and economic deprivation in South Bristol, UK, from November 2001 to May 2003. PARTICIPANTS: 10 grandmothers and five fathers in focus groups and interviews. Twenty-nine families in the intervention. INTERVENTION: an antenatal intervention for grandmothers or partners to support breast feeding, which combined the benefits and mechanics of breast feeding with ways of providing support for breast feeding.
FINDINGS: using an antenatal session based around a leaflet, specifically written for grandmothers and partners, and including a demonstration of good breast-feeding positioning and attachment in addition to the discussion of specific issues around the health benefits and mechanics of breast feeding was found to be acceptable, useful and enjoyable by all participants, particularly for first-time parents. The importance of fathers and grandmothers in providing emotional and practical support for breast-feeding mothers is highlighted, since those who were still breast feeding at eight weeks all felt that they were receiving similar or better support postnatally than they were antenatally. Significantly more intervention mothers were breast feeding their babies at eight weeks than in the wider practice population of mothers outside the study who intended to breast feed. Fathers' attitudes to breast feeding postnatally were fairly similar to those before the baby was born with breast feeding in public and knowing how much milk the baby was getting having the most influence on whether they felt that their partner should continue to breast feed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: this type of intervention could be part of a multi-faceted approach towards improving breast-feeding initiation and continuation, particularly in areas of low prevalence. Health professionals should be opportunistic about involving other family members in discussions about breast feeding whenever possible, both antenatally and postnatally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15571885     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  16 in total

1.  Association of family and health care provider opinion on infant feeding with mother's breastfeeding decision.

Authors:  Erika C Odom; Ruowei Li; Kelley S Scanlon; Cria G Perrine; Laurence Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.910

2.  Using community maternity care assistants to facilitate family-focused breastfeeding support.

Authors:  Jenny Ingram; Debbie Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding.

Authors:  Olukunmi O Balogun; Elizabeth J O'Sullivan; Alison McFadden; Erika Ota; Anna Gavine; Christine D Garner; Mary J Renfrew; Stephen MacGillivray
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-09

4.  Community-based maternal and newborn educational care packages for improving neonatal health and survival in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Sophie Ge Kedzior; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-05

5.  ABM Clinical Protocol #19: Breastfeeding Promotion in the Prenatal Setting, Revision 2015.

Authors:  Casey Rosen-Carole; Scott Hartman
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Relationships between types of father breastfeeding support and breastfeeding outcomes.

Authors:  Lynn A Rempel; John K Rempel; Katrina C J Moore
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Relatively speaking? Partners' and family members' views and experiences of supporting breastfeeding: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Yan-Shing Chang; Kan Man Carmen Li; Kan Yan Chloe Li; Sarah Beake; Kris Yuet Wan Lok; Debra Bick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.671

8.  Multiprofessional training for breastfeeding management in primary care in the UK.

Authors:  Jennifer Ingram
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 3.461

9.  Dads make a difference: an exploratory study of paternal support for breastfeeding in Perth, Western Australia.

Authors:  Bruce Maycock; Yvonne L Hauck; Peter Howat; Sharyn Burns; Colin W Binns; Jenny Tohotoa
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 3.461

10.  Middle Eastern mothers in Sweden, their experiences of the maternal health service and their partner's involvement.

Authors:  Pernilla Ny; Lars Plantin; Elisabeth D Karlsson; Anna-Karin Dykes
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.