Literature DB >> 15571881

An exploration of midwives' views of the current system of maternity care in England.

Tina Lavender1, Jean Chapple.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to explore, in-depth, the views of midwives working in maternity services about birth setting, models of care and philosophy of care.
DESIGN: an Appreciative Inquiry approach was adopted utilising focus group interviews as the method of data collection.
SETTING: 15 focus group interviews were conducted at 14 sites in England. PARTICIPANTS: a purposive sample of 120 midwives and six student midwives who were serving women in different birth settings (home, free-standing maternity units, midwife-led units, and traditional obstetric units) participated, in 2001/2002.
FINDINGS: the main themes generated by the midwives were: cultural changes; midwifery leadership; appropriate role models; training in normality; appropriate responsibility of care divisions; choice for women; equity of care provision between women considered to be at high or low risk; and staff morale. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: this study highlighted the consistency of views amongst midwives working in different settings. Midwives wanted support to practice autonomously in an environment that facilitated equity of care for women and job satisfaction for midwives. Suggestions were put forward by midwives on how to improve maternity services. A unified approach is required to develop these suggestions into strategies, that will remove the identified barriers and promote normality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15571881     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  8 in total

1.  Improving Midwifery Care in Ugandan Public Hospitals: The Midwives' Perspective.

Authors:  Rose C Nabirye; Florence Beinempaka; Cindrella Okene; Sara Groves
Journal:  Int J Health Prof       Date:  2014-12

2.  A statewide review of postnatal care in private hospitals in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Rayner; Helen L McLachlan; Della A Forster; Louise Peters; Jane Yelland
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Experiences of midwives on pharmacological and non-pharmacological labour pain management in Ghana.

Authors:  Lydia Aziato; Abigail A Kyei; Godsway Deku
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  "I love being a midwife; it's who I am": A Glaserian Grounded Theory Study of why midwives stay in midwifery.

Authors:  Dianne Bloxsome; Sara Bayes; Deborah Ireson
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Impact of the Enhanced Universal Support Offer to Care Homes during COVID-19 in the UK: Evaluation using appreciative inquiry.

Authors:  Sally Fowler-Davis; Rachel Cholerton; Mandy Philbin; Kathy Clark; Gill Hunt
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2021-10-25

6.  Exploring Professional Support Offered by Midwives during Labour: An Observation and Interview Study.

Authors:  Stina Thorstensson; Anette Ekström; Ingela Lundgren; Elisabeth Hertfelt Wahn
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2012-12-04

Review 7.  A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth.

Authors:  Catherine Henshall; Beck Taylor; Sara Kenyon
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Evaluation of an Organisational Intervention to Promote Integrated Working between Health Services and Care Homes in the Delivery of End-of-Life Care for People with Dementia: Understanding the Change Process Using a Social Identity Approach.

Authors:  Sarah Amador; Claire Goodman; Elspeth Mathie; Caroline Nicholson
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 5.120

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.