Literature DB >> 15571734

Interocular suppression is gated by interocular feature matching.

Tim S Meese1, Robert F Hess.   

Abstract

We present a new form of contrast masking in which the target is a patch of low spatial frequency grating (0.46 c/deg) and the mask is a dark thin ring that surrounds the centre of the target patch. In matching and detection experiments we found little or no effect for binocular presentation of mask and test stimuli. But when mask and test were presented briefly (33 or 200 ms) to different eyes (dichoptic presentation), masking was substantial. In a 'half-binocular' condition the test stimulus was presented to one eye, but the mask stimulus was presented to both eyes with zero-disparity. This produced masking effects intermediate to those found in dichoptic and full-binocular conditions. We suggest that interocular feature matching can attenuate the potency of interocular suppression, but unlike in previous work (McKee, S. P., Bravo, M. J., Taylor, D. G., & Legge, G. E. (1994) Stereo matching precedes dichoptic masking. Vision Research, 34, 1047) we do not invoke a special role for depth perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15571734     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Steady-state contrast response functions provide a sensitive and objective index of amblyopic deficits.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Mathieu Simard; Dave Saint-Amour; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Functional burden of strabismus: decreased binocular summation and binocular inhibition.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Zachary Fenoglio; Eileen Birch; Steven Nusinowitz; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Advantage of binocularity in the presence of external visual noise.

Authors:  Joanna M Otto; Michael Bach; Guntram Kommerell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Normative reference ranges for binocular summation as a function of age for low contrast letter charts.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Federico G Velez; Fei Yu; Joseph L Demer; Eileen Birch
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2014-10-06

5.  Shifting eye balance using monocularly directed attention in normal vision.

Authors:  Sandy P Wong; Alex S Baldwin; Robert F Hess; Kathy T Mullen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A reevaluation of achromatic spatio-temporal vision: Nonoriented filters are monocular, they adapt, and can be used for decision making at high flicker speeds.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Daniel H Baker
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-06-21

7.  Interactions between surround suppression and interocular suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Yong-Chun Cai; Shena Lu; Chao-Yi Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Deconstructing Interocular Suppression: Attention and Divisive Normalization.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Precues' elevation of sensitivity is not only preattentive, but largely monocular.

Authors:  J A Solomon; M J Morgan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Freya A Lygo; Tim S Meese; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.737

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.