| Literature DB >> 15571631 |
Zoe Veneti1, Masanori J Toda, Gregory D D Hurst.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Selfish genetic elements that distort the sex ratio are found widely. Notwithstanding the number of records of sex ratio distorters, their incidence is poorly understood. Two factors can prevent a sex ratio distorter from invading: inability of the sex ratio distorter to function (failure of mechanism or transmission), and lack of drive if they do function (inappropriate ecology for invasion). There has been no test to date on factors causing variation in the incidence of sex ratio distorting cytoplasmic bacteria. We therefore examined whether absence of the male-killing Wolbachia infection in D. bifasciata in Hokkaido island of Japan, in contrast to the presence of infection on the proximal island of Honshu, was associated with failure of the infection to function properly on the Hokkaido genetic background.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15571631 PMCID: PMC535909 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-52
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
The sex ratio produced during introgression of the male-killing infection to the Hokkaido genetic background. 'All-female' classification represent cases where both replicates produced all female broods. Where males were produced within a female-biased sex ratio, data is given separately for each replicate of the isofemale line.
| Generation | Sex ratio | No. of lines | Line-replicate: male |
| n | progeny/total | ||
| F1 | All female | 24 | |
| Female biased | 0 | ||
| F2 | All female | 21 | |
| Female biased | 3 | 15-1: no males. 15-2: 2/74 | |
| 21-1: 1/32. 21-2: no males | |||
| 25-1 no males. 25-2: 1/10 | |||
| F3 | All female | 19 | |
| Female biased | 5 | 12-1 no males. 12-2: 1/18 | |
| 15-1: 2/27 15-2: 2/52 | |||
| 17-1: 2/20 17-2: 1/46 | |||
| 20-1: 1/10 20-2: no males | |||
| 25-1: 1/40 25-2: no males | |||
| F4 | All female | 24 | |
| Female biased | 0 |
The sex ratio in male-killer infected isofemale lines from Hokkaido following transfer of the introgressed infected lines to 23.5°. 'All-female' classification represents cases where both replicates produced all female broods. Where males were produced within a female-biased sex ratio, data is given separately for each replicate of the isofemale line.
| Generation | Sex ratio | No. of lines | Line-replicate: male |
| n | progeny/total | ||
| F1 | All female | 20 | |
| Female biased | 0 | ||
| F2 | All female | 20 | |
| Female biased | 0 | ||
| F3 | All female | 16 | |
| Female biased | 4 | 11-1 no males 11-2: 1/21 | |
| 19-1: 1/28 19-2: no males | |||
| 23-1: 1/37 23-2: no males | |||
| 25-1: 1/11 25-1: no males | |||
| F4 | All female | 20 | |
| Female biased | 0 |
Catch rate of D. bifasciata in seven locations within Japan during early-mid October between 1973 and 1984. Catch rate is given as mean per trap per day, with number of traps and number of days trapped in parentheses. Proportion of catch that was bifasciata is given across all traps and days, with total Drosophila catch in parentheses.
| Island | Location | |||
| Hokkaido | Misumai | 42°57' N 141°16' E | 4.67 (5, 14) | 13.6% (2407) |
| Koryukozan | 42°51' N 141°17' E | 8.38 (5, 17) | 15.94% (4458) | |
| Tomakomai | 42°43' N 141°36' E | 6.48 (6, 14) | 2.01% (27033) | |
| Matsumae | 41°26' N 140°08' E | 2.54 (8, 7) | 2.48% (5726) | |
| Honshu | Mimmaya | 41°10' N 140°24' E | 0.21 (8, 7) | 0.51% (2342) |
| Morioka | 39°15' N 141°10' E | 0.79 (4, 7) | 0.82% (2683) | |
| Kiyosumi | 35°10' N 140°10' E | 0.00 (4, 7) | 0 (903) |
Figure 1Collection sites for D. bifasciata in Japan