Lily Chu1, John F Schnelle, Mary P Cadogan, Sandra F Simmons. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Los Angeles Jewish Home for the Aging, School of Medicine, CA, USA. ChuRainier@aol.com <ChuRainier@aol.com>
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine how many nursing home residents can provide stable responses to a simple pain interview and whether a Minimum Data Set (MDS) cognitive performance measure can be used to identify these residents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: Thirty-three community-based nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred ninety-five nursing home residents. MEASUREMENTS: Resident completion rate, stability, and interrater reliability of a four-item interview derived from the Geriatric Pain Measure were calculated. Demographic data and MDS items concerning pain and memory were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: Overall, 835 residents were able to answer all four interview questions. At the lowest MDS recall score of 0, 52.7% of residents were able to complete all questions. All residents able to respond to the interview achieved high stability (kappa=0.633, P<.001). Overall, 62.8% of residents with daily pain or activity-limiting pain on interview did not have daily or moderate to severe pain recorded on the MDS. Residents who had lower MDS recall scores were significantly less likely (P=.004) to be appropriately identified on the MDS. CONCLUSION: Residents with a low MDS recall score were significantly less likely to be noted on the MDS as having serious pain despite being able to complete a simple yes/no interview about pain in a stable fashion. Nursing staff should attempt to ask all residents direct questions about pain. Surveyors may restrict direct questioning to those residents with an MDS recall score of 1 or higher if time is an important consideration. Adjustment for MDS-derived prevalence of pain based on residents' cognitive status is questionable.
OBJECTIVES: To determine how many nursing home residents can provide stable responses to a simple pain interview and whether a Minimum Data Set (MDS) cognitive performance measure can be used to identify these residents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: Thirty-three community-based nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred ninety-five nursing home residents. MEASUREMENTS: Resident completion rate, stability, and interrater reliability of a four-item interview derived from the Geriatric Pain Measure were calculated. Demographic data and MDS items concerning pain and memory were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: Overall, 835 residents were able to answer all four interview questions. At the lowest MDS recall score of 0, 52.7% of residents were able to complete all questions. All residents able to respond to the interview achieved high stability (kappa=0.633, P<.001). Overall, 62.8% of residents with daily pain or activity-limiting pain on interview did not have daily or moderate to severe pain recorded on the MDS. Residents who had lower MDS recall scores were significantly less likely (P=.004) to be appropriately identified on the MDS. CONCLUSION: Residents with a low MDS recall score were significantly less likely to be noted on the MDS as having serious pain despite being able to complete a simple yes/no interview about pain in a stable fashion. Nursing staff should attempt to ask all residents direct questions about pain. Surveyors may restrict direct questioning to those residents with an MDS recall score of 1 or higher if time is an important consideration. Adjustment for MDS-derived prevalence of pain based on residents' cognitive status is questionable.
Authors: Todd B Monroe; Sumathi K Misra; Ralf C Habermann; Mary S Dietrich; Ronald L Cowan; Sandra F Simmons Journal: Geriatr Gerontol Int Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 2.730
Authors: Sandra F Simmons; John F Schnelle; Avantika A Saraf; Chris Simon Coelho; J Mary Lou Jacobsen; Sunil Kripalani; Susan Bell; Amanda Mixon; Eduard E Vasilevskis Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2015-07-16
Authors: Susan P Bell; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Avantika A Saraf; J M L Jacobsen; Sunil Kripalani; Amanda S Mixon; John F Schnelle; Sandra F Simmons Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sandra F Simmons; Susan Bell; Avantika A Saraf; Chris S Coelho; Emily A Long; J M L Jacobsen; John F Schnelle; Eduard E Vasilevskis Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Todd B Monroe; Sumathi Misra; Ralf C Habermann; Mary S Dietrich; Stephen P Bruehl; Ronald L Cowan; Paul A Newhouse; Sandra F Simmons Journal: Pain Manag Nurs Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 1.929