S Anwar1, S Hughes, A J Eadie, N A Scott. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester, UK. suanwar@aol.com
Abstract
AIM: To compare the long-term outcome of patients after right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer undergoing ileocolonic reconstruction either by a sutured technique or by side-to-side stapled anastomosis. METHODS: Single surgeon series from 1992 to 2001 comprising 100 consecutive patients, 59 with hand sutured reconstruction and 41 undergoing TLC 55mm stapled side-to-side anastomosis. Details of gender, patient age, and elective versus emergency presentation, Dukes stage, and curative versus palliative resection were recorded prospectively. In addition, post-operative hospital stay and subsequent survival were determined by prospective protocol follow-up. RESULTS: Overall 24% of the patients studied presented as emergencies and underwent a palliative procedure. There were no anastomotic leaks in either the stapled or sutured groups. Hospital mortality was also not significantly different--stapled reconstruction, 7%, sutured reconstruction, 10% (p value 0.624). Overall long-term cancer outcome was the same for both anastomotic techniques, both stapled and sutured groups having a median survival of 2.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled ileocolonic reconstruction after right hemicolectomy for colonic carcinoma is a safe and reliable surgical technique associated with long-term cancer outcomes comparable with those obtained by the sutured anastomotic technique.
AIM: To compare the long-term outcome of patients after right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer undergoing ileocolonic reconstruction either by a sutured technique or by side-to-side stapled anastomosis. METHODS: Single surgeon series from 1992 to 2001 comprising 100 consecutive patients, 59 with hand sutured reconstruction and 41 undergoing TLC 55mm stapled side-to-side anastomosis. Details of gender, patient age, and elective versus emergency presentation, Dukes stage, and curative versus palliative resection were recorded prospectively. In addition, post-operative hospital stay and subsequent survival were determined by prospective protocol follow-up. RESULTS: Overall 24% of the patients studied presented as emergencies and underwent a palliative procedure. There were no anastomotic leaks in either the stapled or sutured groups. Hospital mortality was also not significantly different--stapled reconstruction, 7%, sutured reconstruction, 10% (p value 0.624). Overall long-term cancer outcome was the same for both anastomotic techniques, both stapled and sutured groups having a median survival of 2.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled ileocolonic reconstruction after right hemicolectomy for colonic carcinoma is a safe and reliable surgical technique associated with long-term cancer outcomes comparable with those obtained by the sutured anastomotic technique.
Authors: Matteo Frasson; Pablo Granero-Castro; José Luis Ramos Rodríguez; Blas Flor-Lorente; Mariela Braithwaite; Eva Martí Martínez; Jose Antonio Álvarez Pérez; Antonio Codina Cazador; Alejandro Espí; Eduardo Garcia-Granero Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 2.571